United Nations Threat Continues

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • 4sarge

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Mar 19, 2008
    5,907
    99
    FREEDONIA
    United Nations Threat Continues

    Friday, July 18, 2008

    Over the past 7 years, the United Nations (UN) has been working to reach agreement on an international treaty on the trade in small arms. A "Meeting of States" has occurred every two years on the topic, and is going on once again in New York City. The threat this poses to our Second Amendment rights is real. Thanks to the efforts of U.S. officials, its progress has been delayed, but, unfortunately, not stopped.

    The "Programme of Action On Illicit Small Arms Trade" is the working group in the UN trying to create an international agreement to regulate firearms worldwide. The scope of that regulation is being debated, along with how far that regulation would intrude on the domestic policies of member nations. Former U.S. Representative to the UN John Bolton made it clear that the U.S. would not accept any agreement or treaty—or even participate in any effort that would result in an agreement or treaty—that would threaten the Second Amendment rights of Americans. Even after his tenure at the UN ended, Bolton's influence over U.S. policy remains, and has greatly hindered the ability of this group to advance its agenda.

    It is vital to note that the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) is the primary driving force behind these activities. IANSA is led by radical international anti-gun activist Rebecca Peters. Peters formerly worked for George Soros' Open Society Institute and maintains close ties to the rabidly anti-gun Soros. Their anti-gun agenda includes the imposition of domestic gun control regulations on all nations, and includes broad scale bans on gun ownership, as was masterminded by Peters in Australia.

    This radical anti-gun agenda has been held at bay by the policies set in place by the Bush Administration, but those policies may end on January 20, 2009. On that day, a new U.S. President will be inaugurated, and it will be his policies that are advanced. If Barack Obama wins the White House, it is a near certainty that the men and women he will appoint to key positions at the State Department will cooperate with the anti-gun agenda of groups like IANSA. The imposition of a treaty, if approved by the Senate and signed by the President, could undercut the gains made with the Heller decision, and make the Second Amendment rights of Americans subject to international restriction.

    A president has powers that go far beyond his authority to sign or veto legislation. The appointments he makes to cabinet offices and ambassadorships will play an enormous role in shaping U.S. policy. Under President Bush, the appointments of men such as John Bolton, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito have made the difference that has protected and advanced our individual liberties. Under a President Obama, all that could be lost due to the appointment of men and women who oppose our Second Amendment rights.

    NRA-ILA :: Legislation
     

    flagtag

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 27, 2008
    3,330
    38
    Westville, IL
    Is it time to start preparing for another "Revolution"? ;^p Seriously, we need to keep on top of these anti-American groups who seem intent on a "take over" of our great country. Hitler didn't succeed, so his worshipers appear to be picking up the slack. Eyes open, everyone. Also make your voices heard.
     

    Justus

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jun 21, 2008
    642
    18
    not in Indy
    "Israel Decries U.N. Troops After Peacekeepers Salute Dead Hezbollah Terrorists"


    Israel is calling for removal of two United Nations soldiers from Lebanon after photographs surfaced of the soldiers saluting the coffins of Hezbollah terrorists during a prisoner exchange Wednesday.
    Associated Press photographer Mohammed Zaatari captured an image of the troops paying homage to fallen Hezbollah fighters as trucks bearing their coffins drove through the city of Tyre in southern Lebanon.
    The blue-helmet U.N. troops, who operate under the auspices of the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), are meant disarm Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and be an impartial buffer along the country’s border with Israel.
    FOXNews.com - Israel Decries U.N. Troops After Peacekeepers Salute Dead Hezbollah Terrorists - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News
     
    Last edited:

    4sarge

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Mar 19, 2008
    5,907
    99
    FREEDONIA
    .... and yet we have the outside world demanding that we coronate Obama so that he can surrender US Sovereignty to the UN.
    Not in my lifetime :xmad:
     

    Don

    Expert
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    19   0   0
    Jan 17, 2008
    1,009
    38
    Greenfield
    UN_helmet-small.jpg
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?

    You know... While this makes a powerful statement, let's remember that this represents another person who's doing his job and wants to go home to his family. That said, perhaps this will serve as enough warning to some that if they are placed under UN control and told to turn on our own people and violate the Constitution they swore to "defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic", perhaps a desertion charge is preferable to a ventilated skull.

    They can't say there was no warning.

    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable." --JFK

    Blessings,
    B
     

    flagtag

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 27, 2008
    3,330
    38
    Westville, IL
    You know... While this makes a powerful statement, let's remember that this represents another person who's doing his job and wants to go home to his family. That said, perhaps this will serve as enough warning to some that if they are placed under UN control and told to turn on our own people and violate the Constitution they swore to "defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic", perhaps a desertion charge is preferable to a ventilated skull.

    They can't say there was no warning.

    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable." --JFK

    Blessings,
    B

    Most, if not all of them will have family here. They would just have to remember that another group of them might be dealing with their family members. Reminders before action might help.
     

    Windwalker

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 20, 2008
    111
    16
    Our government should never have joined the U.N. and should now get us out as quickly as possible. Let the U.N. find another free lunch ticket.
     
    Top Bottom