U.S. Diplomatic Vehicles Fired Upon, Mexico City

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • CSORuger

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2011
    1,054
    36
    Brownsburg Indiana
    The Drug Enforcement Administration confirmed that a U.S. diplomatic vehicle was "shot up" in Mexico, but said no DEA officers were involved in the incident.

    Why were Mexican marines, driving a U.S. Embassy vehicle, with no US agents? :dunno:

    The Joint Staff Report revealed that the operation known and authorized at the highest levels of the Justice Department and which included agents from ATF, DEA, FBI, ICE, and the IRS, allowed guns to be illegally purchased in the United States and transported to Mexico to end up in the hands of members of drug cartels. This chain of events inevitably placed the guns in the hands of violent criminals which the Department of Justice not only was aware of, but sponsored and supported. The Department of Justice and its agency partners knew that the foreseeable result of this strategy was that death and destruction would occur in Mexico.

    The New Cocaine Cowboys, How to Defeat Mexico’s Drug Cartels" (July/August 2010, p.25), the United States government’s plan to destroy the Cali and Medellin drug cartels in Colombia was based (as in this case) on giving carte blanche to rival cartels to continue their drug smuggling operations in the United States without concern for its associated death and destruction in both countries, in return for their assistance against the Cali and Medellin cartels. He makes it clear that in Colombia, "the objective was to dismantle and destroy the Cali and Medellin cartels-not to prevent drugs from being smuggled into the United States or to end their consumption"
    The United States government considered the arrangements with the Sinaloa Cartel an acceptable price to pay, because the principal objective was the destruction and dismantling of rival cartels by using the assistance of the Sinaloa Cartel-without regard for the fact that tons of illicit drugs continued to be smuggled into Chicago and other parts of the United States and consumption continued virtually unabated.
     

    badwolf.usmc

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 29, 2011
    737
    18
    2 hourse SE of Chicago
    Why were Mexican marines, driving a U.S. Embassy vehicle, with no US agents?

    The article does not say that, all it says is that a U.S.Embassy vehicle was attacked and three Mexican Marines were injured. It could be that they were passengers inside the vehicle, or they were all part of a convey in which their vehicle was hit as well.

    My guess would be that our vehicle had some kind of advisers in it and the Mexican police were providing a vehicle/s for an escort.
     

    9mmfan

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 26, 2011
    5,085
    63
    Mishawaka
    I would put money on the fact that all northern local and federal police in Mexico are bought and paid for by the cartels. It's time to extend a 5 mile 'security zone' into Mexico. Plant a million land mines and fence it off. Only have one border crossing per state. :twocents:
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,218
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    I would put money on the fact that all northern local and federal police in Mexico are bought and paid for by the cartels. It's time to extend a 5 mile 'security zone' into Mexico. Plant a million land mines and fence it off. Only have one border crossing per state. :twocents:

    I've got to ask: why in the world would we place a US national security zone on Mexican soil? I could go with doing it on our side of the border, though, million landmines and all.
     

    ghunter

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Apr 23, 2009
    628
    18
    nap-town
    The maxim "Civis Americus sum" used to have meaning, like "Civis Romanus sum" did a long time ago. Those days are over.
     
    Top Bottom