Now average people are afraid of you because of it.
I would argue, they are afraid because of a complicit media.
The actual action is not relevant.
Now average people are afraid of you because of it.
Who is they? You'll have to clarify. But honestly, I don't think even you know who "they" is.They were doing it in furtherance of black nationalism.
Who is they? You'll have to clarify. But honestly, I don't think even you know who "they" is.
So the White people supporting BLM are Black Nationalists?
So the White people supporting BLM are Black Nationalists?
Obvious reasons?Why would you think that they aren't?
Obvious reasons?
So now White supporters of BLM reject Christ? Do you know how unhinged that sounds? Like really?The entire modus operandi of modern progressive dimwits is suicidal altruism. Since they reject Christ, they worship at the alter of self hate and intersectionality.
You just flew over the cuckoo's nest.
A guy shooting up muslims is in no way comparable to people exercising their first ****ing amendment right for a redress of grievances, after being ignored time and time and time again.
The rioters injured a lot of people as well. Remember the guy who punted that guy’s head? An example, but certainly not exhaustive of injuries cause by the riots ALL SUMMER LONG, compared to one day.Right, they just injured like 140 officers. Which do you prefer, injury to property or people?
Throwing tea in a harbor didn't fix anything either, but we still talk of it fondly almost 250 years later. You evidently view this as a singular event that seemed to achieve little or perhaps set us back; time will tell if that remains the case. It did appear to scare the crap out of members of Congress. They didn't wall off DC and call in thousands of NG when BLM burnt down the place. They appeared desperate to maintain the appearance of control because they got a taste of losing it, even if there wasn't really a chance of that happening on Jan 6.Yeah. Not very well, obviously. The right wing social media was used to plan it. And I'm not sure by whom. But there was plenty of evidence that it was planned.
Could have been white nationalists posing as patriots goading people on social media to participate. You lace just about any message with Patriotic language, and it's like cat nip to some people. The end goal I guess would be to get Trumpers villified and possibly join them? The Christchurch shooting had a similar motive. Or, it could actually have been legitimate Trumper patriots, albeit extraordinarily foolish ones. Which one do you want to pick? There are some other possible scenarios, but the one where storming the capital by just breaking in and that somehow fixing everything doesn't seem all that plausible, does it to you?
I’ll concede that point. But the “well they didn’t start any fires,” doesn’t resonate well, when you take into account all the injured from that same event.The rioters injured a lot of people as well. Remember the guy who punted that guy’s head? An example, but certainly not exhaustive of injuries cause by the riots ALL SUMMER LONG, compared to one day.
Oh. You guys gained zero and lost a lot. No one respects it except a very few people who think it was just dandy. If you do it again the left has justified already whatever they want to do to put it down. The people, think you’re terrorists while you think something was actually accomplished. I hope I don’t have to say I told you so. I hope you can deduce the outcome from the reality we’re in.Throwing tea in a harbor didn't fix anything either, but we still talk of it fondly almost 250 years later. You evidently view this as a singular event that seemed to achieve little or perhaps set us back; time will tell if that remains the case. It did appear to scare the crap out of members of Congress. They didn't wall off DC and call in thousands of NG when BLM burnt down the place. They appeared desperate to maintain the appearance of control because they got a taste of losing it, even if there wasn't really a chance of that happening on Jan 6.
It’s like I said. You don’t typically score any moral points when you have to start out, “at least we...”I’ll concede that point. But the “well they didn’t start any fires,” doesn’t resonate well, when you take into account all the injured from that same event.
Why not? Kinda like a reverse Clayton Bigsby.Obvious reasons?
So now White supporters of BLM reject Christ? Do you know how unhinged that sounds? Like really?
Posing the question back I guess.Why would someone have white guilt if they weren't were following Christ?
Posing the question back I guess.
My point was that I don't see the connection between following Christ (or the lack thereof) and white guilt.Posing the question back I guess.