I think you left out 'Hrumpf' during editingMore Bug selective editing. You quote the post that was a reply to MIKE not BUG. Then you fail to respond to the BUG response following the MIKE response and make a claim I pivoted in my response to you.
The BUG DSP filter just has too much reverb.
Your points in the above post are not even in temporal order even when your transitional words imply that they are, which is why disingenuous would be a word with which you are well aquainted. If you wish to engage the response to you, fine. If you wish to apply your favorite DAW software to move things around to fit your agenda, that's also fine but I won't play that game.
Love the stratagem of denying the accuracy of a condensation of posting blather into the general sense of said posting because you never said exactly the words in the condensation (which never pretends to be a quote because a citation of all or part of a post is a literal quote)
It seems an obvious attempt to induce analysis paralysis. If you are so upset by my abstractions, it seems you are best equipped to know precisely where I have failed to grasp the puissance of your argumentation. So post up the citations, with or without circles and arrows on the back, so that we may appreciate how deeply you have been wronged