Jaybird1980
Grandmaster
Does America first policies involve ragging on one of the better Republicans in office?Is that because of America first policies or mean tweets?
Does America first policies involve ragging on one of the better Republicans in office?Is that because of America first policies or mean tweets?
Neither, when he became a sore loser extraordinaire, surpassing Algore, Hilary and Abrams, and tried to induce Pence to overturn the certified state election results to APPOINT him president...Is that because of America first policies or mean tweets?
So, we'll put you down as a vote for 'BOHICA' on the election integrity questionNeither, when he became a sore loser extraordinaire, surpassing Algore, Hilary and Abrams, and tried to induce Pence to overturn the certified state election results to APPOINT him president...
That would be when he lost any chance of ever again garnering my vote.
Ever.
Clealy you do not know what happened and get you news from the MSM mockingbird media.Neither, when he became a sore loser extraordinaire, surpassing Algore, Hilary and Abrams, and tried to induce Pence to overturn the certified state election results to APPOINT him president...
That would be when he lost any chance of ever again garnering my vote.
Ever.
This statement isn't true. I also point out that constitutional scholars were unsure of protocol when there are disputed electors from a State(s). With or without this particular issue, Pence is proven to be weak politically. He rode the Orange coattales for his own gain. When the going got rough, he bailed. It's the same MO Pence has used politically any time the going gets rough.tried to induce Pence to overturn the certified state election results to APPOINT him president...
Clealy you do not know what happened and get you news from the MSM mockingbird media.
Please show me when Trump tried to get pence to appoint him President?
Not really... your dispute is in the state courts. There were no "disputed" electors from the states... there were CERTIFIED electors from the states.This statement isn't true. I also point out that constitutional scholars were unsure of protocol when there are disputed electors from a State(s). With or without this particular issue, Pence is proven to be weak politically. He rode the Orange coattales for his own gain. When the going got rough, he bailed. It's the same MO Pence has used politically any time the going gets rough.
So you accept there was a dispute regarding state electors?Not really... your dispute is in the state courts. There were no "disputed" electors from the states... there were CERTIFIED electors from the states.
Well. I agree with most of that. Not all that sure about not megalomaniac after seeing the ad “on the 8th day” put out by the DeSantis campaign. Yeesh! I mean. At least we’re all pretty sure he didn’t **** a porn star while his wife is pregnant with his kid. So there’s that.Maybe because his ego won't allow him to realize when's he's shooting\shot himself in the foot. First time around, the nicknames were generally fun because they mostly directed at the primary candidates the right flank of the party disliked or tolerated, the exception being Ted Cruz. I think the right flank overlooked the Cruz nicknames because they were yearning for a bare knuckle brawler after decades of their milquetoast candidates getting steamrolled by similar tactics from the democrats, because they wouldn't take the gloves off and punch back, hard. 2020, he had no opposition so both barrels were directed at Hillary. Now he's resorted to the same thing that worked in 2016, but he's miscalculated because the landscape has changed on the Republican side. Desantis is seen by the right flank as a brawler, though a bit more polished than Trump and without the narcissistic megalomaniac personality. If Trump wishes another shot at the nomination, he CANNOT direct this type of fire at a potential Republican candidate that the base sees as as tough a political fighter as Trump but without the downsides we ignored in the last two cycles.
Yes. Because he’s infallible. If he says someone is bad, they’re bad regardless.Does America first policies involve ragging on one of the better Republicans in office?
Isn't that the goal really?
Well. Let’s not get crazy. If it’s a choice between a megalomaniacal blowhard cult leader, porn star ****ing, sore loser extraordinaire, versus a bat **** crazy communist loving, kid ****ing, racist bag of ****, nation destroying pedo, I guess I’m stuck with voting for the porn star ****er. At least he’s America-first.Neither, when he became a sore loser extraordinaire, surpassing Algore, Hilary and Abrams, and tried to induce Pence to overturn the certified state election results to APPOINT him president...
That would be when he lost any chance of ever again garnering my vote.
Ever.
Everyone? I seriously doubt that.Trump...I think very soon,he will regain everyone's respect.
I think the measure we are supposed to go by is that you can be the biggest a-hole in the world and that's fine as long as you deliver on America first policies that I care about and benefits me.Well. Let’s not get crazy. If it’s a choice between a megalomaniacal blowhard cult leader, porn star ****ing, sore loser extraordinaire, versus a bat **** crazy communist loving, kid ****ing, racist bag of ****, nation destroying pedo, I guess I’m stuck with voting for the porn star ****er. At least he’s America-first.
Ok,maybe most everyone.Everyone? I seriously doubt that.
It's a better measure than hotnessI think the measure we are supposed to go by is that you can be the biggest a-hole in the world and that's fine as long as you deliver on America first policies that I care about and benefits me.
It really is bizarre.Yes. Because he’s infallible. If he says someone is bad, they’re bad regardless.