Huh. I saw it as non-productive vs. productive. I guess it could go either way.Not how I read it.
I see the first as more of a racial/class question, and the second as a pro-union/laborer question. There is a big difference between the two.
Huh. I saw it as non-productive vs. productive. I guess it could go either way.Not how I read it.
I see the first as more of a racial/class question, and the second as a pro-union/laborer question. There is a big difference between the two.
Definitely provides support for the swing state narrative in the Rust belt that union workers are breaking for Trump.I think this is rather telling...
View attachment 386247
Suggesting that "people like you" aren't "American workers".
I will leave that to experts.Huh. I saw it as non-productive vs. productive. I guess it could go either way.
As I've said in the treads in the breakroom, I've been in the union for 25ish years and 95% of the Union workers I've delt with from all trades Vote RepublicanDefinitely provides support for the swing state narrative in the Rust belt that union workers are breaking for Trump.
You would know better than I so I will just ask you.As I've said in the treads in the breakroom, I've been in the union for 25ish years and 95% of the Union workers I've delt with from all trades Vote Republican
Up here those that have signs in their yards about being union tend to have D election signs as well.I've worked in 6-8 states from Minn. to Ohio and from Mich. to Georgia. So a wide variety of people and locations.
It holds true for the guys from Detroit to Quincy Ill. and from Minneapolis to Cincinnati
Union management doesn't care.Up here those that have signs in their yards about being union tend to have D election signs as well.
Why, if so many union members vote Republican, do the Unions always support Democrats?
How did the union management get their positions?Union management doesn't care.
And thinks they know better than us.
Bribes and kickbacksWhy, if so many union members vote Republican, do the Unions always support Democrats?
Well said. Bravo!Donald Trump, for all his faults, was a refreshing change in 2016, as the first potential party nominee, who articulated wanting to deal with the nation's troubles, without having spent a career directly causing those troubles.
That alone made him a worthwhile candidate.
His name recognition made him a viable candidate.
After inauguration, even though it was an uphill slog all the way, hamstrung by the media and lying Democraps, and kneecapped by traitors within his own party and administration, he demonstrated, for the most part, that our faith had been well placed, and he was a trustworthy candidate.
For only the second time in my life, a President with views I could support, did what he promised to do. How refreshing.
On a daily basis, he took the fight to our enemy's doorstep, and never turned away in the face of fire.
Until his administration was derailed by the deadly, and some would say, (get your tin hats) deliberate pandemic, his policies proved themselves effective.
I'd like to see a return to his policies.
So I voted for him today.
I also wanna see some revenge on his tormentors.
There, I said it.
The Big Get Even Tour.
Just another reason to vote for him, if ya' gotta' have one.
Washington DC is full of useless monuments to stupidity and waste (like Schumer, Pelosi, Schift, the heads of the 3 letter agencies, etc.)
They, and their ilk, as well as some of the buildings could stand to go. We'll, maybe not the buildings, rather the people working in them.
So, viewed with respect to what DT has done, and has intimated that he wants to do.....I don't mind so much if he's not the most articulate man. Or the most moral.
Patriotism goes a long way towards alleviating the "weight" of morals, especially when the opponents exhibit none.
Not "questionable" morals...the Democraps have NO morals.
I hope he wins.
I hope he makes wise appointment choices.
I hope he is able to push his agenda over the finish line, to the benefit of all Americans.
In short, I hope he kicks some ass.
PS. Upthread, someone said Killary was the worst candidate ever.
Sorry, no. That was Michael Dukakis.
Even Killary was smart enough to avoid the "Beetle Bailey" photo/moment, and she never let anyone see her standing next to her broom.
Foz, I've said this before but I'll rehashThat's rather the point of the article. Be harder for her to do anything unless the Senate and House go D, which is the less likely scenario.
I would be interested in your thoughts on how Trump is paying for his? Can you cite anything that tells us how? At least you can cite what you did for Kamala as its all over the place.
Ah, yes. Just like in his first term, yes?If Trump wins, it is also likely that the Senate and the House will be Republican held making it much easier to implement his policies
IMO this ia a feature and not a bug, provided the induced higher prices/margins are used as an inducement to domestic production with legal American workers. There are a number of places with significant national security implications where we could start - critical infrastructure to support the grid like high power transformers, chemical components for ammunition like primers and powder (why is no nitrocellulose produced domestically?), shipbuilding, nuclear and conventional energy etc etc. I think it is OK for government to not exactly pick winners in that space so much as encourage good growing conditions for domestic start-upsMany economists also contend that Trump's proposed tariffs on goods from China and other trading partners would increase prices for consumers.
And there in lies why so many are pushing for war...If nothing else, WWIII would 'restructure' the debt market
Senior management, I have no idea.How did the union management get their positions?