Top 5 Court Cases every carrier should know

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,586
    113
    Kirk and Cathy thanks for the list and also the effort of getting the files on Kirk's list. I have read a couple already. It is just what I was looking for so I can read through this stuff for myself and have an informed discussion here and elsewhere. It ought to at least give me a framework to think about these matters. As I read through I plan to ask some questions :)
     

    Double T

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   1
    Aug 5, 2011
    5,955
    84
    Huntington
    I would think that simply telling the LEO your name, adress, DOB is ok to ID yourself (if not driving), DL (if driving), and when questioned regarding firearms say "nothing illegal" and show the pink LTCH. All questions should then cease re:firearms.

    If you are asked further questions, that's where a recorder comes in handy.

    Refuse warrantless SnS. And record everything. Know your rights, and know what cse law states. LEO don't know case laws, and IME get frustrated when a "civvie" knows more than them.

    Case law is for use in a courtroom, not arguing with a guy in a uniform on a street corner.

    The less you say, the better. Especially if you are recording the encounter. If you are being frisked, ask "am I being detained" and if they say no say "am I free to leave?"

    It's not too difficult. Understanding what can and cannot be done does not safeguard you against it happening. Citing case law does nothing. Understand what they are violating, and file a complaint or civil suit after the fact. And, mind your p's and q's during the stop.
     

    DerekBogie

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 7, 2012
    29
    1
    (Adam) Starr v State, 49A04-0912-CR-677 (2010)
    This one kind of blew me away. I was always under the impression that failure to identify had no circumstance on when it can be asked. Learn something new everyday i come to :ingo:
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,233
    113
    Merrillville
    (Adam) Starr v State, 49A04-0912-CR-677 (2010)
    This one kind of blew me away. I was always under the impression that failure to identify had no circumstance on when it can be asked. Learn something new everyday i come to :ingo:
    All he had to do was give his name, address, and date of birth.

    quote
    The next successive statutory provision, Indiana Code Section 34-28-5-3.5, under which Starr was convicted, provides:
    A person who knowingly or intentionally refuses to provide either the person's:
    (1) name, address, and date of birth; or
    (2) driver's license, if in the person's possession;
    to a law enforcement officer who has stopped the person for an infraction or ordinance violation commits a Class C misdemeanor.
    endquote

    But I guess the restraining order thing would have been a problem.
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,270
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Yes sir, about Finger.

    Cathy or Kirk?

    Finger sez holding onto one driver's license is a detention (but in Finger the circumstances warranted a detention).

    Finger would have have gone to prison if he just asked "Am I free to go?" For some reason people WANT to run their baconholes.
     
    Top Bottom