Title IX vs Trans rights; who wins?

[Ingomike]

I agree with those that think this will work itself out over time and I hope it will be allowed to do so without a heavy handed government intervention.

How can that be? Government intervention caused the problem…

 

[Ingomike]

 

[jamil]

Feminism destroyed men. Trans is now destroying women, communism will destroy trans…

Theory will destroy Trans eventually because it has to. Orthodoxy—any orthodoxy—creates oppression. So when something becomes normal it must be attacked.

 

[Magyars]

 

[Ingomike]

This is pretty big, the ranks are breaking…

Major ESPN Personality Breaks Rank on Issue of Trans Athletes in Women's Sports

townhall.com

 

[Cameramonkey]

If you want trans athletes in sport, create divisions for them. Problem solved.

 

[Ingomike]

WOW!

Watch Company Comes Out With 'Brilliant' Ad Taking on 'Woke Corporate America'

townhall.com

 

[gassprint1]

If you want trans athletes in sport, create divisions for them. Problem solved.

I think they already do, the special Olympics. I have seen people in yhose games that looked and acted perfectly fine, but were said to have a mental problem. . It's a bit mind boggling why there is even a debate. It's pretty simple...when they did urine or whatever tests years back that i think was Olympics,..either you were a male or female. There was no in-betweens for any of this crap

 

[Doug]

meh.
All of the well-known "women's" groups exist only to support the Democrat party. That was obvious when Eleanor Smeal, president of NOW, supported Bill Clinton and said, "We should all put on our Presidential knee pads and give him a b*** j** for keeping abortion legal."
The Democrats count on women's votes the same way they count on minorities' votes and will happily through them all under the bus to get the trans vote.

 

[edporch]

If you want trans athletes in sport, create divisions for them. Problem solved.

Since it's medically impossible to change a person's sex, they should still just compete in the boys/men's or girls/women's events that match their sex.
Seems pretty obvious to me.

 

[Ingomike]

JUST IN: House Republicans Pass Bill to Ban Transgender Athletes in Women and Girls' Sports | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

On Thursday, the Republican-controlled House passed a bill that would prevent transgender women and girls from competing on girls’ or women’s sports teams at federally supported schools and colleges, AP reported.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

In before the inevitable grandstanding accusations because the senate will not pass it…

 

[printcraft]

trans wants to kill people that block bathrooms

EDITED

 

[KLB]

JUST IN: House Republicans Pass Bill to Ban Transgender Athletes in Women and Girls' Sports | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

On Thursday, the Republican-controlled House passed a bill that would prevent transgender women and girls from competing on girls’ or women’s sports teams at federally supported schools and colleges, AP reported.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

In before the inevitable grandstanding accusations because the senate will not pass it…

You think it isn't?

 

[actaeon277]

If you want trans athletes in sport, create divisions for them. Problem solved.

Problem is, it clashes with the 'trans women are REAL women' ideology.

 

[actaeon277]

Those that call for violence, are often surprised that violence can be used against them.

 

[Ingomike]

You think it isn't?

They are doing what I expect them to do since they were elected to be conservative. Sothey sit in the house and do nothing until someone says “I think if we pass it now they will pass it in the senate”?

 

[DoggyDaddy]

They are doing what I expect them to do since they were elected to be conservative. Sothey sit in the house and do nothing until someone says “I think if we pass it now they will pass it in the senate”?

The problem has been, even when the R's held both houses and the presidency, they still do nothing. As has been said, a problem solved is a campaign issue lost. That's the only way I can explain it.

 

[Ingomike]

The problem has been, even when the R's held both houses and the presidency, they still do nothing. As has been said, a problem solved is a campaign issue lost. That's the only way I can explain it.

That literally has not been the case since GWB that there has been a unified control of all branches. Like it or not there are three parties, dems, CoC repubs, and MAGA. The CoC and MAGA are in a battle for control of the party. Do you think for a minute if MAGA controlled the party in 2017 there would not be a wall, border security, immigration reform, and a host of other things like hearing protection?

This is MAGA showing what they can do…

 

[DoggyDaddy]

That literally has not been the case since GWB that there has been a unified control of all branches. Like it or not there are three parties, dems, CoC repubs, and MAGA. The CoC and MAGA are in a battle for control of the party. Do you think for a minute if MAGA controlled the party in 2017 there would not be a wall, border security, immigration reform, and a host of other things like hearing protection?

This is MAGA showing what they can do…

Do you think a MAGA Senate is possible?

 

[Ingomike]

Do you think a MAGA Senate is possible?

That is an excellent question. At this point I say yes, but red states like Indiana need to send better senators than Young. It should only take 26 MAGA and 25 other repubs to get MAGA leadership.

Remember that the house MAGA are the most likely source of MAGA senators…