Let's take a look at what a Warloski win would have meant:
1. Putting H3llfire Jackie in the house. Bonus! I'd love to see here there just for the heartburn she'd give to Pelosi!
2. Would her race have given the GOP a Veto-Proof majority in the House? Nope? They're not close enough to get there.
3. Would the GOP have taken the US Senate with her race? Nope. Coats won without her coat tails.
All Jackie winning would have done in the National Picture - was to give the GOP one more vote in an already big majority in the house.
The GOP cannot do a darn thing right now at the national level except stop the Progressive agenda. They currently have enough votes to do that in the House, with or without JW being there.
Yes, having Jackie in the house would have been a good thing. I've lived in Andre Carson's district, and I know the feeling of desperation one has living in a district represented by the other side.
However, the Libertarian in that race did not out preform those in the rest of the state. Jackie took on a sitting congressman in Pat Bauer's back yard. You had to break through the liberal blockade known as St. Joe County.
I know it feels nice to blame the other party. Perhaps we can get our Sect State and Legislature to approve some common sense districts across the state that are not slanted to keep a single party's candidate in office. Then, the voters will really have a choice.
There's one other thing. A Jackie win would have made it easier to fix the Elkhart county gerrymandering that has kept this District of Indiana Democrat.