Freedom is a great thing. Would I have exposed my young, impressionable children to this circus? Probably not.
I think this is an important point. The parents who brought their children to the event did so by choice. They didn’t hold this event at school or on a field trip. I just can’t understand why someone would take issue with this event rather than deciding they don’t agree with it and moving on with life. Instead, some seem to think the government should block peaceful and lawful assemblies simply because a certain percentage of people have a moral issue with it.
What public funds? Are the drag queens being paid?
Let's put it this way-
This is an officially sanctioned public library event. Money, no money, whatever. With a controversial issue, and it is controversial, why is the library taking a position...which they are.
Think not? Try to get equal time at the library, with the library promoting it, for people to read say, some passages from the Bible and discuss why not confusing genders is important.
The drag queens? Obviously, they can say and do what they want and people can make choices about what they expose their children to. It would be nice for a public facility to remain completely neutral.
I am in favor of the try-to-get-permission-for-Bible-readings at the library approach. It is likely a public venue, so there can (basically) only be time/place/manner restrictions.
I am in favor of the try-to-get-permission-for-Bible-readings at the library approach. It is likely a public venue, so there can (basically) only be time/place/manner restrictions.
Marxism? Really? How so?Marxist doctrine being fulfilled right here!
Marxism? Really? How so?
Marxist doctrine being fulfilled right here!
Neo-Marxist identity politics based on equality of outcome
They advertised this event. Parents CHOSE to bring their kids. If this guys wants to be a drag queen, great. If parents want him to read to their kids, great. I don't see the problem nor the Marxist connotations. Is this furthering the concept of egalitarianism? While I could see this argument maybe used for protected classes, a man dressing up as a women for entertainment purposes does not fit.