The Real Obama Supporters

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Disposable Heart

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 99.6%
    246   1   1
    Apr 18, 2008
    5,807
    99
    Greenfield, IN
    You agree with US Taxpayers handing out $845 Billion to foreign countries based on mandates by the United Nation? You support a One World Order? This great Country already gives more than any nation on earth. How many nations have stepped up to help out the flood victims of the Midwest? Not a damn one of them. But you want my taxes to go up to support some UN Scam like Oil for food where the money ends up in Terrorists hands? I'm having a hard time understanding you?

    I wouldnt necessarily go that far. As far as the Midwest goes, no one gives aid because the US never asks for it (not to mention the vast majority of other nations wouldnt do it). Technically, that action threatens US soveignty in the eyes of the government and the citizens. I wish folks would understand that America would be physically invaded ever before the "big bad UN" does anything. The UN is a popular scapegoat for many radio talk shows as it is big, multinational, and has SOME power. The US hasnt paid any of it's UN dues and I dont imagine them doing it anytime soon. Why? Soveriegnty. America will not be a puppet for a multinational group like "UN".

    Soveriengty is our friend. Incidentally, the money going to terrorists knows no bounds, not even political alignment.

    Obama money: Politicians of any type take money from the rich. That has NEVER changed and NEVER will. That is something that can be counted on. Also, politicians flip flopping or making actions contrary to their original postings are NOT new and while its of a concern, I dont get in a fluff about it because EVERYONE changes their views. Obama seems more poll oriented, so he is going to win the middle as well as try to win the outer ends of the spectrum.

    Clinging: Words, only words. I agree that the word isnt necessarily the best. I do agree with Sphynx that people tend to turn to what they think is the best in "hard times". Government, religion, racism, booze, family are all things held in high regard when the chips are down and things are going down. Nothing new.

    Socialism: Apt label for anything that people dont like. They will spout off definitions of Socialism and compare it to the "left's" view. I, for one, am highly in favor of universal health care. Realistically, what is so bad about it? More taxes? Stop buying so much frivolous things as you can now cover your ENTIRE family no problem with good health care. Decreased health coverage? Look at Canada; universal care there and it's top notch. What about the doctors, they wont make as much and will make more mistakes? Not really, once again, most of the universal situations have great health care. Granted a pure socialist government is a bad thing but only as ALL the socialist governments (with only a few now) up until now have been person centered, not party centered. When one man is given all the power, it turns out bad. In general though, people fear what may have even .5% of power over them.

    Personally, I also dont see a threat about a "poverty" bill being put into action. A failing economy, sluggish spending and taxing, and soveriegnty in the US will put an end to that quickly. This is simply fearing something that will not come about and if it does, last only a quick second. I tend to look at facts, not "columns" and not "talk radio". Those mostly use opinion papers as fact to create a panic amoung people like us and usually to boost money into one industry: Guns. Ever look around at a gunshow? Lots of things about selling gold or selling hicap mags before the government takes them. I will never give my money to any seller that has already taken a defeatist attitude in this matter. There is no AWB2 yet, so lets keep focused and keep it from happening. Same situation with all politics.

    Sphynx: I agree with a few things that you say. I am not particularly for either candidate, but unfortunately, the past few elections havent been much of one side or the other anyways. Obama's social programs arent terrible in my opinion, but his second amend and personal concepts dont sit well with me. I am not hot to trot about McCain, but I havent began to know either candidate well enough to vote for either.

    Anyways, I am glad to see you speak your mind and FREELY so.

    I am out of this arguement. Back to the regularly scheduled program (aka, The High Road, more gun talk, less politics). BTW: How about some voting record posts, instead of the usual picture of an Obama supporter then ridiculing them. Its politics not a school yard. Youre not going to make anyone cry, just embolden their resolve.
     

    DustinG

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 8, 2008
    304
    16
    I love this shirt:

    shirtsquare-mic.jpg


    It explains a lot!
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    ...In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that declaration commits nations to banning "small arms and light weapons"...Even these increases, however, will not be enough to satisfy the requirements of the Obama bill. A global tax will clearly be necessary to force American taxpayers to provide the money.

    Two separate phrases, on different subjects, but here's the thing about both: Our Constitution, the supreme law of the land, clearly states that those powers not granted to the federal government in the Constitution are beyond governmental reach at that level. State governments and the people, that is, the individual citizens, do not make or sign treaties with the UN, nor do they implement taxes of this nature. The US government, if this bill passed/passes, oversteps that limitation.

    I agree with that bill, and don't see how you think it will bankrupt America. I think it's long past time to be thinking globally instead of just nationally, and considering we as a country spend more on military than the rest of the world combined, I can think of the perfect place to make cuts that will cover those expenses. We start by helping the world instead of picking fights with it.

    Kindly show me some reason why the American taxpayer is responsible for paying a global tax to fund something, anything. Kindly show me how disarming innocent people protects innocent people. Kindly show me how any of this would have passed muster with our Founders, who started a revolution and created a new country in response to (at the end) arms control and taxes on tea.

    If you can do those things, I will be very surprised. At the moment, your attitude and your apparent disdain for my country disgusts me.

    Yes, I said MY country. You seem to be distancing yourself from her with every post. I am reminded of a famous speech:

    "If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

    Blessings,
    B
     

    Paul

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 16, 2008
    1,554
    36
    Brownsburg
    Socialism: Apt label for anything that people dont like. They will spout off definitions of Socialism and compare it to the "left's" view. I, for one, am highly in favor of universal health care. Realistically, what is so bad about it? More taxes? Stop buying so much frivolous things as you can now cover your ENTIRE family no problem with good health care. Decreased health coverage? Look at Canada; universal care there and it's top notch. What about the doctors, they wont make as much and will make more mistakes? Not really, once again, most of the universal situations have great health care. Granted a pure socialist government is a bad thing but only as ALL the socialist governments (with only a few now) up until now have been person centered, not party centered. When one man is given all the power, it turns out bad. In general though, people fear what may have even .5% of power over them.

    Universal Health Care is a horrible idea. Whats so bad about it??? How about putting our pharmaceutical companys out of business. How about its not the governments responsibility. How about, when was the last good thing the government took over and did a good job with???...

    So your saying i should stop buying things i enjoy to pay for some poor smucks health coverage. Who is going to pay for all this? The tax payers...

    Look at Canada....you mean their horrible health care where it takes forever to go to the doctor and to get things done that you need.

    Universal Health Care would put my mom and many people who work in the pharmaceutical companys. There are ways to lower the cost without universal health care. :chillout:
     

    BloodEclipse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 3, 2008
    10,620
    38
    In the trenches for liberty!
    Universal Health Care is a horrible idea. Whats so bad about it??? How about putting our pharmaceutical companys out of business. How about its not the governments responsibility. How about, when was the last good thing the government took over and did a good job with???...

    So your saying i should stop buying things i enjoy to pay for some poor smucks health coverage. Who is going to pay for all this? The tax payers...

    Look at Canada....you mean their horrible health care where it takes forever to go to the doctor and to get things done that you need.

    Universal Health Care would put my mom and many people who work in the pharmaceutical companys. There are ways to lower the cost without universal health care. :chillout:

    You want a good example of the government in control of health care? Look at the Veterans Administration. In fact you can look to any government bureaucracy and see how much waste and mismanagement is there. Then multiply that inadequacy many times because with Universal health care you get their plan and nothing else.
     

    Disposable Heart

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 99.6%
    246   1   1
    Apr 18, 2008
    5,807
    99
    Greenfield, IN
    There are ways to lower the cost without universal health care. :chillout:
    I am seriously interested in this. From my point of view, I see huge companies that are, in many cases, tied into the healthcare system. Huge medical bills and "mandatory" drugs for diseases that really dont exist (I guess I need pills for my irritable face syndrome) cost people dearly. The biggest thing is to create a government run situation, however, build it without loopholes for corruption, like most government programs. It can be done but very difficult to initially create.

    Maybe more ethics in regards to doctors? I dont think the Pharma companies are to blame, they are just there to make money, not prescribe people. Where there is a need, they fill it, no matter how strange the drug or its numerous side effects worse than the original disease. However, maybe a lot of doctors need to cut back on the frivoulous stuff. As for doctor operating costs, not much one can do about that. They pretty much determine how much their services can be, so they can charge alot, because after all, how can one put a price on their life.

    While I dont believe it to be a conspiracy, I am not a fan of countless millions going to fund how to give a guy an erection, while AIDS research has to struggle in Congress or in the private sector to get funding.

    To the rest: I talk to countless Canadians. The people waiting for health care are usually stuff like irritable face syndrome. Everyone Ive talked to said that the healthcare is top notch and relatively expediant. Not AS fast as American health care, however, there is no long billing and agonizing paperwork afterwards. I strongly dislike the idea of someone going through painful surgery, painful physical therapy, then having to argue with insurance companies and billing companies regarding who foots the bill.

    BTW: I do like that Mickey Mouse Obama shirt. It represents some of his views (mikey mouse ones :D:D). I would buy one!
     

    BloodEclipse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 3, 2008
    10,620
    38
    In the trenches for liberty!
    Maybe more ethics in regards to doctors? I don't think the Pharma companies are to blame, they are just there to make money, not prescribe people. Where there is a need, they fill it, no matter how strange the drug or its numerous side effects worse than the original disease. However, maybe a lot of doctors need to cut back on the frivoulous stuff. As for doctor operating costs, not much one can do about that. They pretty much determine how much their services can be, so they can charge alot, because after all, how can one put a price on their life.

    Entire article can be found here: Malpractice Costs Have New York Doctors Seeking Shelter Elsewhere | Insurance > Liability Insurance from AllBusiness.com

    This is just to show why Doctors costs have gone up. I'm sure this isn't the only large expense they incur. I don't think cost are associated with bad ethics. Not that I'm happy about it as my medical coverage seems to COVER less each year.

    The high cost of medical [FONT=georgia,serif][FONT=georgia,serif]malpractice[/FONT][/FONT] insurance has some obstetrician/gynecologists cutting back on the scope of their business, while others are fleeing New York altogether.
    And Long Island hospitals are worried that the price of malpractice insurance will lead to a health-care access crisis
    for pregnant women and for lower-income patients.

    Donn Haber, vice president for risk management at the North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, said all hospitals, including those in his network, are affected by doctors moving out of state, dropping hours or slicing back parts of their practice.
    Already arguing they're choked by high insurance costs, doctors were drilled again last July, when, with the approval of State Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo, New York upped medical malpractice insurance by 14 percent. In 2007, ob/gyns paid the fourth-highest amount for medical malpractice insurance in the nation, according to the Medical Liability Monitor. Suffolk and Nassau ob/gyns that participate in the Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Co. pay a starting rate of $177,880.

    Indiana isn't quite so bad as we have passed laws to limit liability. that can be found here: Lower 2008 Malpractice "Surcharges" for Indiana Physicians at MDsalaries - The Physician Salaries Blog

    BTW: I do like that Mickey Mouse Obama shirt. It represents some of his views (mikey mouse ones :D:D). I would buy one!

    I like this one.
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,601
    Messages
    9,954,468
    Members
    54,893
    Latest member
    Michael.
    Top Bottom