I just tuned in to FOX news, and Mike Pences plane skidded off a runway .....
Anyone hear about this ?????
I just tuned in to FOX news, and Mike Pences plane skidded off a runway .....
Anyone hear about this ?????
John Anderson/Jon Andersson - where did all those Swedes come from?
Trump has been telling people he's matching donations (he's donated almost nothing last month).
He actually donated more to Hillary's 2008 campaign than his own campaign this month.
And he gave just $31,000 to his own campaign during first three weeks of October.
All in-kind, no cash
* 2016 results reflect polls conducted since the third presidential debate, not over the final week of the campaign.
LEADING CANDIDATE POLLING MARGIN YEAR NO. POLLS LEADING CANDIDATE HIGH LOW AVERAGE STD. DEVIATION 1976 3 Jimmy Carter +4 -1 +1.3 2.5 1980 4 Ronald Reagan +5 +1 +2.5 1.9 1984 5 Ronald Reagan +25 +10 +17.2 6.2 1988 8 George H.W. Bush +19 +4 +9.1 4.8 1992 9 Bill Clinton +8 +2 +5.7 2.3 1996 8 Bill Clinton +18 +7 +11.8 3.2 2000 9 George W. Bush +5 TIE +2.9 1.8 2004 14 George W. Bush +6 -2 +1.6 2.3 2008 18 Barack Obama +11 +5 +7.6 1.8 2012 22 Barack Obama +4 -1 +1.2 1.5 2016* 22 Hillary Clinton +14 -1 +5.3 3.6
But it’s not just your imagination if you feel like there’s more variation in the polls than you’re used to.
So although the wide spread in the polls this year may reflect challenges in the polling industry, you shouldn’t make a habit of berating the polls that seem to be outliers or use a somewhat unorthodox methodology. Aggregating mechanisms like polling averages and betting markets are powerful precisely because they reflect a diverse array of approaches and opinions, and they lose their power when they’re subject to herding or groupthink. You also shouldn’t cherry-pick the two or three polls that fit your narrative when there are dozens of them out there, of course. But ignoring or “debunking” the polls you don’t like is often almost as bad a sinas cherry-picking the ones you do like.
Absolutely idiotic, if you're concerned with your bottom line. Hipsters, love that beer (or maybe used to).
Absolutely idiotic, if you're concerned with your bottom line. Hipsters, love that beer (or maybe used to).
A lot of Hipsters are voting for Trump...The whole "anti establishment" thing...Kind of like punk rockers supporting Reagan back in the day....Trump is not not status quo....Cool people rebel against status quo...Clinton is status quo..
Marketing genius IMHO.....
(As Kut hums Huey Lewis and the News "It's Hip to be Square"...)
If they loved that beer, that shouldn't change.
I think most of the boycott talk, from conservatives or liberals, rarely hits the bottom line that hard, especially after the 1st quarter of earnings post boycott.
Love to see some historical evidence of how product boycotts have worked in the past and their efficacy in modern times.
Yes, but do they wear a man bun?But your premise rests on the idea that hipsters are actually cool ... outside their own minds. Personally, all I can think of when I see those tiny, pipe stem legs is 'Get thee to a gymnasium!'
Related to the election, there's been a development in the FBI investigation.
Looks like meats back on the menu
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...-state-dept-raises-flags-183.html#post6793241
Related to the election, there's been a development in the FBI investigation.
Looks like meats back on the menu
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...-state-dept-raises-flags-183.html#post6793241
Wow.
And the October Surprise arrives.
Barely.
But it is still October.