BehindBlueI's
Grandmaster
- Oct 3, 2012
- 26,608
- 113
You define relative peace as violent and aggressive expansion followed by a gradual beating back?
The British Empire? Oh, right, Ottomans. Well, we're not talking about the entire Ottoman Empire, we're talking about the Middle East. What did the rest of the world look like in the same 600 years? What was Europe doing? What was what would become the Soviet Union up to? Yes, the Middle East was relatively peaceful when you look at the context of the day. Relative peace isn't total peace. I'd suppose most of us would agree America is relatively peaceful...but can you pick a decade since our existent we didn't have some fight somewhere? Yet, these days, it isn't on our home turf and war doesn't really effect the majority of us.
As far as your terrorist list, yes, it's a hand full. There are over 1.5 BILLION people who identify as Muslim. About 1 in 4 of the world population. Then there's the argument of if all of them are religiously motivated. Just because a Muslim does something, doesn't mean they did it because they are Muslim. Think of Ferguson. The underlying issue was racial tension, but is anyone willing to step up and argue that they rioted because they were black? Or insinuate that all blacks are rioters? Or post a video titled "a good black female" and then show a woman loot a store? No, of course not. We all know how long that sort of bigotry would last on INGO.
So, let's look at that. The Kurds are Muslim, generally, and they've been fighting for decades. Why? Well, primarily because they want their own country. Many of the groups may recruit heavily with religious messages, and many of the foot soldiers (so to speak) are likely drawn in by that argument. We don't usually call the Kurds terrorists...because they are fighting people we would like them to fight. What's Turkey think? Yet we can all agree that's not predominately a religious war. It's a war for the reasons most wars are fought, resources. The Catholic/Protestant battles in the UK? Really over religion? Or over territory and questions of self-rule with a sprinkle of religious trappings and using religion as the morale supporting storyline behind your struggle? For that matter, the forming of Israel? All about religion? The Jews coming home to a promised land? Or because the Jews were being systematically prosecuted in the majority of Europe and Russian territories and the powerful story behind returning to a homeland was used to motivate and gain support? A lot of secular Jews were Zionists, after all.
It's very simple to say "Islam is violent, Muslims are violent, this is all because of Islam." Again, you just have to ignore millions and millions of Muslims, or pick through and decide "well, they aren't REALLY Muslim" to cherry pick what you want to prove. That's why I posted the thread about living in the Middle East. It's real tough to continue to believe all Muslims are terrorists or violent when you see a man and a woman helping kids build robots with giant foam blocks. The vast, vast, majority are just going about their day, raising families, going to work, living their lives. The problems tend to cluster in areas of poverty, ignorance, and political strife. Actually, the same types of places crime flourishes here for the most part.