The Hillary Clinton’s Private E-mail thread

[printcraft]

I need to run outside and see if anybody else is out there yet............

 

[cbhausen]

The government is supposed to serve We the People... the corruption and cronyism in DC is destroying We the People's faith in our government. For better or for worse Trump comes along at a time when he can take advantage of that sentiment.

Given the only two viable choices are Hillary or Trump, I'll take my chances with the latter.

 

[KG1]

I need to run outside and see if anybody else is out there yet............

Me too. BRB....

 

[Hop]

I was searching wikileaks at lunch. I found a couple emails to/from whitehouse staff.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Wikileaks Releases Nearly 20,000 DNC Emails | The Daily Caller

 

[Ericpwp]

 

[ArcadiaGP]

****ing hell. This is how corrupt **** is.

Leaked emails show POLITICO's Ken Vogel emailed his stories to the DNC before publishing them.

Like that subject line, "Per agreement"?

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808

 

[mrjarrell]

****ing hell. This is how corrupt **** is.

Leaked emails show POLITICO's Ken Vogel emailed his stories to the DNC before publishing them.

Like that subject line, "Per agreement"?

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808

That's weird. Why would you send a Hillary hit piece to the dnc for them to look over? Maybe so they could craft a response ahead of time? That's a head scratcher. Unethical to boot. Hope Politico shows some backbone and fires him for that.

 

[pudly]

That's weird. Why would you send a Hillary hit piece to the dnc for them to look over? Maybe so they could craft a response ahead of time? That's a head scratcher. Unethical to boot. Hope Politico shows some backbone and fires him for that.

Asked and answered.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

That's weird. Why would you send a Hillary hit piece to the dnc for them to look over? Maybe so they could craft a response ahead of time? That's a head scratcher. Unethical to boot. Hope Politico shows some backbone and fires him for that.

This doc dump run 100% by Russian intel, too, so the point is to hurt Hillary and help Trump. Probably a reason they didn't do a corresponding "RNC doc dump"

 

[printcraft]

#nodemocratmediabiasnonenadazipnotasmidgen

 

[mrjarrell]

This doc dump run 100% by Russian intel, too, so the point is to hurt Hillary and help Trump. Probably a reason they didn't do a corresponding "RNC doc dump"

True. There's little doubt that Guccifer 2 is a Russian government program. You'd think the Trumpkins would be reticent to vote for someone who wants to crawl in bed with Putin.

 

[pudly]

True. There's little doubt that Guccifer 2 is a Russian government program. You'd think the Trumpkins would be reticent to vote for someone who wants to crawl in bed with Putin.

I did a search and although you've commented on Wikileaks quite a number of times, you were complementary, supportive and even defending them until this particular document dump. Interesting...

https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/general-political-discussion/102813-wikileaks.html#post1202491
https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/general-political-discussion/101581-leaks-provide-ground-level-account-afghan-war-4.html#post1187249
https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/general-political-discussion/115299-wikileaks-leak.html#post1395360
https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/general-political-discussion/123057-ron-paul-9-questions-about-wikileaks.html#post1511177
https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/general-political-discussion/229558-big-brother-watching-you.html#post3197621

 

[printcraft]

I did a search and although you've commented on Wikileaks quite a number of times, you were complementary, supportive and even defending them until this particular document dump. Interesting...

https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...-discussion/102813-wikileaks.html#post1202491
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...d-level-account-afghan-war-4.html#post1187249
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...ussion/115299-wikileaks-leak.html#post1395360
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...-9-questions-about-wikileaks.html#post1511177
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...558-big-brother-watching-you.html#post3197621

LOL

Waiting for the logical spin........

 

[mrjarrell]

I did a search and although you've commented on Wikileaks quite a number of times, you were complementary, supportive and even defending them until this particular document dump. Interesting...

https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...-discussion/102813-wikileaks.html#post1202491
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...d-level-account-afghan-war-4.html#post1187249
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...ussion/115299-wikileaks-leak.html#post1395360
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...-9-questions-about-wikileaks.html#post1511177
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...558-big-brother-watching-you.html#post3197621

I have complimented them. But the Guccifer issue leads straight back to the Kremlin, not to any anonymous whistleblowers or individuals. Not sure what that has to do with anything. The thought of a would be American president wanting to cozy up to a Kremlin dictator should be disturbing to any rational person.

 

[printcraft]

We have to sift through for the pure motives? Got it. All hail the purveyor of purity.

 

[pudly]

I have complimented them. But the Guccifer issue leads straight back to the Kremlin, not to any anonymous whistleblowers or individuals. Not sure what that has to do with anything. The thought of a would be American president wanting to cozy up to a Kremlin dictator should be disturbing to any rational person.

So if you don't know who releases sensitive info, it is okay. If you do know, then motives are a problem. Got it.

 

[Ericpwp]

So... Snowden IS Trump, got it.

 

[mrjarrell]

So if you don't know who releases sensitive info, it is okay. If you do know, then motives are a problem. Got it.

Motive is certainly an issue when it's a Russian dictator. If it isn't for you then you may have a problem.

 

[pudly]

Motive is certainly an issue when it's a Russian dictator. If it isn't for you then you may have a problem.

I think you are far more concerned about the target of this particular release. You never showed any such concern with previous releases, even though a number of them have not been complementary to the US and may have even come from the same source.