The Hillary Clinton’s Private E-mail thread

[ArcadiaGP]

I don't use the word "****" very often... but man, she's a real ****.

Hillary Laughs at GOP Benghazi Question, Immediately Scolded: "It's Not Funny" | Mediaite

(Who am I kidding, I love the word.)

 

[bwframe]

Sent the day of.... but nah, it was a protest in reaction to a video.

Hillary Clinton Testifies in Benghazi Hearing ? Live Blog and Video - Washington Wire - WSJ

If this was a hearing for a Republican doing the same bold lying to the public, they would be shunned by the party and lose all hope of further office. Yet Hilary's Dems circle the wagons, saying we have learned nothing new with this hearing.

 

[Leadeye]

This is dc leadership arguing with dc leadership. They don't care about the dead or the money outside of dc, the idea of working for the citizens of this country is as foreign to them as speaking Latin to ants and just as well understood.

 

[1911ly]

This is dc leadership arguing with dc leadership. They don't care about the dead or the money outside of dc, the idea of working for the citizens of this country is as foreign to them as speaking Latin to ants and just as well understood.

I think BW nailed it with the circling the wagons comment. The dem's refuse to believe a fellow party member can do any wrong. Remember how pathetic the Anthony Weiner support was. And the support Bill Clinton got threw the Monica scandal.

Hillary will walk away with a slight tarnish on her record. And that tarnish will be polished away before the election. All she has to do is say "vast right wing conspiracy" and all will be well between her and the dem's.

Sad but true.

 

[actaeon277]

I think BW nailed it with the circling the wagons comment. The dem's refuse to believe a fellow party member can do any wrong. Remember how pathetic the Anthony Weiner support was. And the support Bill Clinton got threw the Monica scandal.

Hillary will walk away with a slight tarnish on her record. And that tarnish will be polished away before the election. All she has to do is say "vast right wing conspiracy" and all will be well between her and the dem's.

Sad but true.

refuse to believe? Or don't care?

 

[ArcadiaGP]

FYI, the hearing is still going on.

Grandma is pissed she missed her stories, and she's getting tired.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

FYI, the hearing is still going on.

Grandma is pissed she missed her stories, and she's getting tired.

Any good "gotcha!" moments?

 

[1911ly]

refuse to believe? Or don't care?

Good point. Probably more of the latter.

 

[actaeon277]

I think BW nailed it with the circling the wagons comment. The dem's refuse to believe a fellow party member can do any wrong. Remember how pathetic the Anthony Weiner support was. And the support Bill Clinton got threw the Monica scandal.

Hillary will walk away with a slight tarnish on her record. And that tarnish will be polished away before the election. All she has to do is say "vast right wing conspiracy" and all will be well between her and the dem's.

Sad but true.

refuse to believe? Or don't care?

Good point. Probably more of the latter.

For some people, right and wrong can be malleable.
For some, it's only for "other" people.

 

[bwframe]

FYI, the hearing is still going on.

Grandma is pissed she missed her stories, and she's getting tired.

Which network is broadcasting the hearing live. FNC and CNN seem to be on their regular evening shows?

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Which network is broadcasting the hearing live. FNC and CNN seem to be on their regular evening shows?

actually sounds like it wrapped up. she was there 11 hours.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Gowdy: Clinton's answers not accurate | TheHill

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Clinton's testimony includes new inconsistencies - POLITICO

 

[jamil]

Clinton's testimony includes new inconsistencies - POLITICO

Seems a likely consequence of hiding the truth. It's how I catch my kid in a lie.

 

[KittySlayer]

It's how I catch my kid in a lie.

Grill them for 11 hours?

 

[jamil]

Grill them for 11 hours?

Time on the grill depends on how many lies were told. More lies. More time it takes to sort them out. It doesn't happen all that often but a good ~10 minutes or so will typically get us down to the truth.

Now 11 hours would be. Like. Crap. I dunno. Maybe **** tons of lies to sort out?

 

[Thor]

Now 11 hours would be. Like. Crap. I dunno. Maybe **** tons of lies to sort out?

With **** tons of liars trying to coordinate them so their testimony matches.

Of course the Dems on the committee are trying really hard to throw out as much chaff and flares as possible. They could care less about the truth, they only want victory for their team.

 

[Arthur Dent]

With **** tons of liars trying to coordinate them so their testimony matches.

Of course the Dems on the committee are trying really hard to throw out as much chaff and flares as possible. They could care less about the truth, they only want victory for their team.

You really think republicans would be any different?

 

[Thor]

You really think republicans would be any different?

Than DemonRats? Heck yeah. There's a reason that when D's are caught at something they just turn their back on the house as they are censured while R's resign. They at least think they should act like they have a base of honesty that they work from...probably did at some point and fell down on life. D's on the other hand just think you're a square fool to have any beliefs that don't mean squat and they came to the job with that belief.

No morals to start with, no morals to finish, playing the world for fools.

So, heck yeah.

 

[jamil]

With **** tons of liars trying to coordinate them so their testimony matches.

Of course the Dems on the committee are trying really hard to throw out as much chaff and flares as possible. They could care less about the truth, they only want victory for their team.

You really think republicans would be any different?

We do need to consider the unforced error of the would be speaker's implication that the Benghazi hearings were for the purpose of ruining Hillary's campaign. I would like to get to the bottom of it. Did Hillary help Obama with the movie protests as a cover story? Did Hillary reject pleas from the ambassador for more security? Was the refusal for extra security intentional? If so, for what purpose? What was Stevens doing in Benghazi? Was this a gun-running operation that's been widely reported in foreign mainstream media? Did Hillary Clinton lie? If so, what did she lie about. And why?

Those are all questions that seem natural given the facts we have, but won't get answered by this committee, ever. Kevin McCarthy gave democrats permission to forego their intellectual curiosity and move on. Most potential democratic voters now think that Benghazi is a fake scandal. At this point it serves no purpose to pursue it without an independently verifiable smoking gun kind of revelation. That's just not gonna happen.

And Bernie Sanders also gave Democrats permission to forego their intellectual curiosity about Hillary Clinton's emails. The polls are showing that fewer people care about that, and more people are thinking that the email scandals are as fake as Benghazi.

People really do have short memories.