And you thought you owned your home and as such had a right to its use. No, you peasant.Where the evidence shows a community is likely to be wiped out in as few as 10 years, that poses an “intolerable level of risk” to the community’s safety or its continued viability. “The only rational response, in the absence of a feasible, cost-effective alternative, will be to relocate the community to a safer place.”
Although most instances of community relocation to date have occurred after a natural disaster, the working group report says, in the future pre-emptive relocation will become increasingly necessary. “Such action can permanently mitigate the risk faced by threatened communities and allow local and central government to exit an increasingly expensive cycle of responding to, and recovering from, destructive storms and similar harmful events.
This little gal is getting a workout tonight.Telling others at the UN...yea this **** is not going to end well.
And you thought you owned your home and as such had a right to its use. No, you peasant.
Then they have this…
Scandal Advice to Ministers: Use Emergency Powers to Relocate Vulnerable Families | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
They are already hinting at this in places like California. They mentioned in an NPR interview that to control flooding we need to remove many of the levees we built to keep the rivers in. We need to remove the levees so that the water can flow naturally into the lowlands to give the water somewhere to to so it doesnt keep getting higher and higher, eventually overtopping other levees, flooding towns downstream.Telling others at the UN...yea this **** is not going to end well.
And you thought you owned your home and as such had a right to its use. No, you peasant.
Then they have this…
Scandal Advice to Ministers: Use Emergency Powers to Relocate Vulnerable Families | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Like they would have a choice. Unless CA is one of the states that severely limited eminent domain, they are screwed.I'm sure those residents wont go willingly.