The Funny Pic Thread, Pt. 8

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    IWv73I9.jpg
     

    rhino

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    30,906
    113
    Indiana
    That picture is incredibly funny (to anyone with a sense of humor).

    I'm not seeing how they are "bound" with the lights. The lights are across them, but if that's "bound" then Christmas trees and rain gutters with lights are "bound." I submit that people who find that photo offensive and consider it degrading and promoting abuse and violence are seeking such where it does not exist. They are projecting their own intent onto someone else.

    That family is hilarious. Is there a way to contact them and offer praise?
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,212
    149
    Valparaiso
    That picture is incredibly funny (to anyone with a sense of humor).

    I'm not seeing how they are "bound" with the lights. The lights are across them, but if that's "bound" then Christmas trees and rain gutters with lights are "bound." I submit that people who find that photo offensive and consider it degrading and promoting abuse and violence are seeking such where it does not exist. They are projecting their own intent onto someone else.

    That family is hilarious. Is there a way to contact them and offer praise?

    I submit that anyone outraged is in one of four categories:

    1) A woman with way too much time on her hands and no sense of humor,
    2) A male who is in or trying to get into the pants of #1,
    3) A woman with no self-awareness (probably #1 as well), or
    4) A man with no exposure to women, or gay, or both.
     

    rhino

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    30,906
    113
    Indiana
    I submit that anyone outraged is in one of four categories:

    1) A woman with way too much time on her hands and no sense of humor,
    2) A male who is in or trying to get into the pants of #1,
    3) A woman with no self-awareness (probably #1 as well), or
    4) A man with no exposure to women, or gay, or both.

    I submit that you are wise and insightful.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,430
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I submit that anyone outraged is in one of four categories:

    1) A woman with way too much time on her hands and no sense of humor,
    2) A male who is in or trying to get into the pants of #1,
    3) A woman with no self-awareness (probably #1 as well), or
    4) A man with no exposure to women, or gay, or both.

    The common theme is no sense of humor.
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,432
    113
    Merrillville
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom