Humans bad. Snail darters good.Why do the insane left want to kill babies so bad?
Humans bad. Snail darters good.
Why do the insane left want to kill babies so bad?
Humans bad. Snail darters good.
Wow. I haven't heard about the snail darter since the 70s.
Why do the insane left want to kill babies so bad?
The short answer is they don't
61M dead babies since Roe vs. Wade isn't a "need". It is a choice. It is also 3.5x the number killed as part of the Nazi Holocaust. Own it.
1.4M dead Americans from guns since 1968. Do gun rights advocates "own" that?
61M "dead babies" since roe v wade? How many before? How many mothers died in botched abortion attempts along the way? How many have since?
Roe v Wade saves the lives of women. Full stop.
It does so, however, at the cost of their own unborn children...unwanted as they may be...and I have no qualms with that, ideologically or pragmatically. It is the place of the pregnant woman seeking to abort that must comprehend and endure the consequences of her actions, not mine. It is up to her to square her behaviors with her own conscience...and that's setting aside any religious implications that may apply. People have abortions whether the procedure is legal or not...where medically-supervised abortion is legally available fewer women die in the process. This is an irrefutable fact.
You can be as outraged as you want...and in a truly free society nobody else has the right to compel you to act otherwise...
...well, in a truly free society you have no right to compel anyone else to behave the way you want, either. Freedom isn't free, to borrow an old cliche.
Summarized- PaulF: 61M dead is an acceptable cost to allow women who *choose* to eliminate babies whether or not the life of the woman is at risk. Freedom isn't free.
So PaulF. How many were choices vs. how many were to save the lives of women? Have those stats anywhere?
IBTL