manifest destiny
Master
I saw a diesel Ram truck just like this one. It had a sticker on the back window that read, "I'm burning all the gas you're saving".Dear EPA,
I saw a diesel Ram truck just like this one. It had a sticker on the back window that read, "I'm burning all the gas you're saving".Dear EPA,
Neil G went cleared hot on this one!Gorsuch throwing shade in his concurrence:
"phone-and-pen regulations"
I think he found the giggle switchNeil G went cleared hot on this one!
This should cover it.The real question for the lawyers is how does this effect things like the ATF making s*** up as they go along
West Virginia wins:
The real question for the lawyers is how does this effect things like the ATF making s*** up as they go along
The threat of turning people into felons by adding things to the nfa comes to mind…….First thing that come to my mind.
Wonder when smart legal minds will weigh in on this?
Lotta legit hardware out there that is subject to question, at the whim of the ATF.
.
Is this the win I think it is?
The Exec branch has a long history of making rules for anything it couldn't get via the Legislative branch.
That’s what they do. And to give them some credit—they’re pretty good at it.I just saw an article yesterday that said that Biden officials already planned to work around whatever decision the Supremes handed down. FJB!
When you cite a case from 1810? That is AWESOME!!Gorsuch's first footnote:
I'm a big fan of his. Kavanaugh and Barret less so.Gorsuch's first footnote:
First thing that come to my mind.
Wonder when smart legal minds will weigh in on this?
Lotta legit hardware out there that is subject to question, at the whim of the ATF.
.
These days I bet he probably isn't burning all that much fuelI saw a diesel Ram truck just like this one. It had a sticker on the back window that read, "I'm burning all the gas you're saving".
Bipartisan my ass. 2 leftist praising each other and the Paris climate accords,while claiming the court can not determine climate policy. I mean the Trump bashing alone should have been a clue. True the court can not make policy,but they sure as hell can decide elected officials and not unelected bureaucrats can. Neither of them said a single thing the democrat party or mainstream media has not already said.Some discussion of this (~20 min):
Climate change at the Supreme Court - SCOTUSblog
On the last day of the term, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of a group of Republican-led states and coal companies to limit the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate carbon emissions system-wide. Amy sits down with investigative journalist and host of Drilled, Amy Westervelt, twww.scotusblog.com
I agree, but think there's some light in there. While they say things like "it's not the end of the world" regarding climate policy, they also acknowledge that this was a starting blow towards reducing Chevron deference. I think it's rather incoherent that liberals talk about those "ideologue conservatives" while the left-leaning judges do or don't like deference depending on the politics of the case. As far as the 3 liberal justices go, when it comes to the BATFE, trust the ATF... when it comes to USCIS and an immigrant, don't trust the gov. At least Gorsuch is consistent in the grand scheme. It's very nice to see the SCOTUS walking back blind deference towards gov agencies. Very nice.Bipartisan my ass. 2 leftist praising each other and the Paris climate accords,while claiming the court can not determine climate policy.
[...]
We get it,they are pissed elected people got back a little bit of control.