I have a new rule of thumb on optics (just now).
Be willing to spend at least as much on your optics as you did on the rifle.
You can't hit it if you can't see it. There are significant, noticeable differences among crap, cheap scopes, inexpensive scopes, midrange scopes, expensive scopes, and the top of the line. If I wanted to learn marksmanship, I would not go below "inexpensive," which in this case is the $150-$250 range in my opinion.
In addition to the clarity of the image and light transmission, you also need a scope that will "answer" or repeat adjustments you make on the elevation and windage screws or knobs. Cheaper scopes are far less likely to satisfy even a semi-serious shooter in this regard.
Getting it mounted properly is also essential. You need good quality bases and rings. You may not need to lap the rings, but you need to make sure the scope's body is aligned with the bore of the rifle and that the two rings do not put any lateral or torsional stress on the body of the scope.
Be willing to spend at least as much on your optics as you did on the rifle.
You can't hit it if you can't see it. There are significant, noticeable differences among crap, cheap scopes, inexpensive scopes, midrange scopes, expensive scopes, and the top of the line. If I wanted to learn marksmanship, I would not go below "inexpensive," which in this case is the $150-$250 range in my opinion.
In addition to the clarity of the image and light transmission, you also need a scope that will "answer" or repeat adjustments you make on the elevation and windage screws or knobs. Cheaper scopes are far less likely to satisfy even a semi-serious shooter in this regard.
Getting it mounted properly is also essential. You need good quality bases and rings. You may not need to lap the rings, but you need to make sure the scope's body is aligned with the bore of the rifle and that the two rings do not put any lateral or torsional stress on the body of the scope.
