IndyGunworks
Grandmaster
I'd be interested to know what CO and security guard experience has to do with your take on pistols with manual safeties. Licensed security guard? Wow. That's impressive. In the People's Republic of New York, no less. I'll only mention that I have over 22 years in the criminal justice field, including positions where we actually use firearms, like the US Army (MP), and for the last 13 years, actual law enforcement with a major metro agency. Perhaps I, too, will aspire to be a "licensed security guard" one day....after I retire.
You wanna carry a DA or striker fired pistol with an unnecessary point of failure? Fine. Have at it. Hillary Clinton would be proud. She also loves unnecessary safeties on firearms. (Hmmm...doesn't she have something to do with New York? I think I read that somewhere.) You be safe out there, guarding whatever it is you guard. Have a nice day.
It has been a tradition for many many years that firearms have a manual safety... are you implying that our forefathers got it wrong? dao/striker fired firearms are a recent development and while they are just as safe many prefer to have the presense of mind with a safety. I am in honest disbelief that you are arguing the point that a manual safety is a bad thing, regardless of what type of firearm it was on... i am a glock man and therefore do not have have TRIGGER BLOCK safteys on my carry guns. If glock offerd a factory gun with an easy to manipulate and cosmetically sound saftey, I would own one as my primary carry piece. Not because i dont trust the other three safetys on it, not because i am not well versed in my firearm, but because its ONE MORE safety device, and MY preference.