Russian passenger plane crashes in the Sinai

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,728
    113
    Uranus
    Yeah, the pic I saw was pretty crude. But, if they could get the can into the passenger compartment with explosive material in it, the other things would just look like wire and a switch. Placed against the fuselage, particularly at a point where there was stress anyway, like a bulkhead, it would probably be enough.

    Carried on board or pre placed there by "aircrew"?
    Think gun in the bathroom scene in The Godfather.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Carried on board or pre placed there by "aircrew"?
    Think gun in the bathroom scene in The Godfather.
    Actually, from the BBC:
    Russia plane crash: IS publishes 'improvised bomb' photo - BBC News

    Security experts told the BBC the "on-off" switch on the device could have been operated by someone on the plane, in effect meaning a suicide bomber was on board.
    An alternative explanation is that the device could have had a pressure-sensor and been detonated when the plane reached a certain altitude.

    The switch has 2 LEDs on it, and presumably a battery in the taped up portion. The switch might simply arm it and power a pressure sensor. It could've been anywhere. But, I'd still guess that it was in carry-on or placed in an overhead bin by an airport worker. Put it and a sandwich and some chips in a brown paper bag and no one would think twice about it.
     

    JollyMon

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 27, 2012
    3,547
    63
    Westfield, IN
    Yeah, the pic I saw was pretty crude. But, if they could get the can into the passenger compartment with explosive material in it, the other things would just look like wire and a switch. Placed against the fuselage, particularly at a point where there was stress anyway, like a bulkhead, it would probably be enough.

    I dont even think it has to be well placed. I believe it would just have to inside a pressurized part of the plane. I took a forensic science class in college and we talked about explosives in planes when one of the guest speakers showed up, and from what I remember, a very small amount of explosives could cause catastrophic damage when the plane was pressurized.

    But then again.... I might be remembering wrong
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Well, from the little I've followed that, it depends on a bunch of factors. I remember in the late 80s/early 90s, there was a jet (to Hawaii, IIRC) that had part of the roof rip off. A stewardess died, but the plane landed.

    Other depressurizations can be catastrophic or not.

    Actually, I go back to the time of the radar signals. I wonder if it was a timer under the switch. Maybe just the face of a watch or something. The explosion appeared to be on the hour. They could pretty easily figure out how long it would take to get to altitude, add a buffer, then round up to the nearest quarter hour.
     

    jblomenberg16

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    67   0   0
    Mar 13, 2008
    9,920
    63
    Southern Indiana
    Actually, from the BBC:
    Russia plane crash: IS publishes 'improvised bomb' photo - BBC News



    The switch has 2 LEDs on it, and presumably a battery in the taped up portion. The switch might simply arm it and power a pressure sensor. It could've been anywhere. But, I'd still guess that it was in carry-on or placed in an overhead bin by an airport worker. Put it and a sandwich and some chips in a brown paper bag and no one would think twice about it.


    Could very well be. A few things strike me though.

    1) A typically pressure sensor has a relatively linear output of voltage vs. pressure, so it would take some additional circuitry to get it to "trigger" since there isn't usually a binary on / off behavior of such a sensor.

    2) I need to do a little more digging, but I don't think that a small 9V battery is enough to ignite a typical electric blasting cap reliably. Yes, they are VERY sensitive to static electricity so when using normally there is great care to prevent an accidental ignition due to stray current. I just don't know if 9v or smaller is enough to actually get one to ignite.


    I do think the can and cap are pretty good bets, and from there the actual trigger mechanism is probably the easy part.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,728
    113
    Uranus
    Could very well be. A few things strike me though.

    1) A typically pressure sensor has a relatively linear output of voltage vs. pressure, so it would take some additional circuitry to get it to "trigger" since there isn't usually a binary on / off behavior of such a sensor.

    2) I need to do a little more digging, but I don't think that a small 9V battery is enough to ignite a typical electric blasting cap reliably. Yes, they are VERY sensitive to static electricity so when using normally there is great care to prevent an accidental ignition due to stray current. I just don't know if 9v or smaller is enough to actually get one to ignite.


    I do think the can and cap are pretty good bets, and from there the actual trigger mechanism is probably the easy part.

    Blowing up the picture (sorry) it doesn't look like a 9V battery. The edging is rounded. They make a 12v pile cell battery, 2 of these in series would give 24v.
    39800110091.jpg
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    I wonder if you could use a capacitor to charge up over time with the right amps. There's probably a cookbook or something out there....
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    haha

    I was nervous enough searching for a pic of the bomb itself. ;) Stuck with a news search and looked for the jpost. :)
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,555
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Actually, from the BBC:
    Russia plane crash: IS publishes 'improvised bomb' photo - BBC News



    The switch has 2 LEDs on it, and presumably a battery in the taped up portion. The switch might simply arm it and power a pressure sensor. It could've been anywhere. But, I'd still guess that it was in carry-on or placed in an overhead bin by an airport worker. Put it and a sandwich and some chips in a brown paper bag and no one would think twice about it.

    Catering loads cases of pop on board. Just one can among many. A popcan sized lump of Semtex detonated in forward or aft galley would impact critical systems
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,555
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I wonder if you could use a capacitor to charge up over time with the right amps. There's probably a cookbook or something out there....

    What about the thyristor circuitry and capacitor from a camera flash? Charges at the voltage under discussion and delivers a high amperage pulse.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    So... this is interesting.

    Everyone figured out a bomb brought down the Metrojet. Russia finally said a bomb brought down the Metrojet. The downing of the jet led, in part, to Russia's escalation against Daesh.

    But wait...
    Egypt: Sinai crash probe finds 'no proof of terrorism' - BBC News

    Egyptian investigators say they have so far found no proof that terrorism caused a Russian jet to crash in the Sinai in October, killing 224 people.

    Now, Egypt certainly has motive to downplay terrorism, in part because their tourism industry took a real hit. But, "no proof" is a strong statement. Especially when it runs counter to what everyone else is saying. If it is for domestic consumption, then who are they trying to convince?
     
    Top Bottom