Rprt: Clinton changed stance on trade deal after donation to Clinton Foundation

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,262
    113
    Gtown-ish

    It's a two pronged question. As Geraldo explains, the real reason was over a "spiked" story, whateverthehellthatmeans, but still the other prong is that it was considered a valid reason to fire him back then. It's not as much an issue now because there is no presumption of journalistic integrity now. Now, more than then, journalism is a pragmatic means to an end that has nothing to do with simply objectively reporting news.

    In all fairness the Clinton foundation is, at least on the surface, a charitable organization and not a political one. I think Stephanopoulos, when interviewing Schweitzer about his critical view of the Clinton Foundation, should have disclosed to Schweitzer and the audience that he has donated money to that foundation. His excuse about it being public record is not a valid one. The fact that he's a donar of the organization he's interviewing about should disqualify him as an objective interviewer.
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    Stephanopolis was literally part of the Clinton Administration. He was a Clinton White House staff member. Why is the donation controversial? Its not exactly shocking or new. He's always been a political operative.
     
    Last edited:

    D-Ric902

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 9, 2008
    2,778
    48
    It's a two pronged question. As Geraldo explains, the real reason was over a "spiked" story, whateverthehellthatmeans, but still the other prong is that it was considered a valid reason to fire him back then. It's not as much an issue now because there is no presumption of journalistic integrity now. Now, more than then, journalism is a pragmatic means to an end that has nothing to do with simply objectively reporting news.

    In all fairness the Clinton foundation is, at least on the surface, a charitable organization and not a political one. I think Stephanopoulos, when interviewing Schweitzer about his critical view of the Clinton Foundation, should have disclosed to Schweitzer and the audience that he has donated money to that foundation. His excuse about it being public record is not a valid one. The fact that he's a donar of the organization he's interviewing about should disqualify him as an objective interviewer.
    I think an investigation would show that many if not most MSM have contributed to the Clinton foundation or any of the other charities of the same type and/or political leanings
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,262
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Stephanopolis was literally part of the Clinton Administration. He was a Clinton staff member. Why is the donation controversial? Its not exactly shocking or new. He's always been a political operative.

    I don't think anyone thinks it's shocking or new. The only thing I'm shocked about is that it's getting any air play from any mainstream sources at all. It *should* be a big deal.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,262
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I think an investigation would show that many if not most MSM have contributed to the Clinton foundation or any of the other charities of the same type and/or political leanings

    You know, if it's just donating to a charity, really, who should care? We probably wouldn't be having a discussion about it if the subject of the interview was The United Way. Who hasn't donated to that? But the Clinton Foundation has a lot more political baggage tied to it, least of which is the old bag herself.
     
    Top Bottom