Every single candidate is electable...unless they screw up & don't get their names on the ballots of enough states. What has been presented as a fact, is actually a guess of what millions of voters will do. All of the matter-of-fact nay-saying is disrespectful to our political process & is getting old. Grow up.
And the name-calling, intelligence-insulting, patriotism-questioning from Paul supporters is what? A quintessential example of our political process? It sure as hell is getting old.
I suppose I don't need to add that there are plenty of statements being passed for fact from Paul supporters that are nothing more than opinions. You'll be dishing out the sarcasm and hate-mongering to them forthwith, yes?
Electable? Every candidate may have a possibility of being elected simply for being on the ballot. But not every candidate has the same probability of being elected simply for being on the ballot. Of course, I think you know when someone says Paul is unelectable they are speaking in terms of probability, not possibility. Is there a reason you ignore that and lash out with such vitriol?