Eh, maybe that's me. I've used that label several times in this thread. I think it's a fairly accurate one based on the views expressed. If you're a libertarian anarchist, wear the label with pride. Be who you are. If not...
ETA: yes, neocons are out there...in do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do land.
Here's a libertarian socialist (aka libertarian anarchist)
Libertarian Socialism:
Libertarian socialists agree with anarcho-capitalists that government is a monopoly and should be abolished, but they believe that nations should be ruled instead by work-share cooperatives or labor unions instead of corporations. The philosopher Noam Chomsky is the best known American libertarian socialist.
If you spend any time reading posts or chatting with the folks posting I this thread, you'd learn quickly that this definition does not apply.
You will most likely find they fall into either:
Civil Libertarianism:
Civil libertarians believe that the government should not pass laws that restrict, oppress, or selectively fail to protect people in their day-to-day lives. Their position can best be summed up by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' statement that "a man's right to swing his fist ends where my nose begins." In the United States, the American Civil Liberties Union represents the interests of civil libertarians. Civil libertarians may or may not also be fiscal libertarians.
Classical Liberalism:
Classical liberals agree with the words of the Declaration of Independence: That all people have basic human rights, and that the sole legitimate function of government is to protect those rights. Most of the Founding Fathers, and most of the European philosophers who influenced them, were classical liberals.