rigid frame bug out bags???

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • baddog12773

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 5, 2008
    10
    3
    HI! I was wondering if anyone could explain the pro's and cons of a rigid frame pack like an ALICE ruck sac over one with no frame? which is better for a bug out bag?thanks
     

    Sailor

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    19   0   0
    May 5, 2008
    3,730
    48
    Fort Wayne
    Depends on how heavy your load is. 80lbs in a ruck with no frame is going to hurt soon.

    I like medium alices packs with no frame to be under 40lbs. But thats just me.
     

    INRanger

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 13, 2009
    242
    16
    I like the ALICE pack with frame. It's comfortable with load over distance or as comfortable as anything with load can be. One piece of advice though ALICE pack are quite large and can hold allot of gear. Resist the temptation, just because you have all that room does not mean you have to use it. Extra room is a GOOD thing, you never know what you might pick up later. Remember, every once counts.
     

    obijohn

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 24, 2008
    3,516
    63
    Terre Haute
    these posters are correct. using a frame allows for a heavier load. it also allows air circulation under the pack. it does, however, make the pack a bit harder to stuff in your vehicle. when i was humping a ruck, the frame was the first to go unless you had the radio. when it's all on your back, you learn pretty quickly what you do, or more importantly, what you do NOT need.
     

    052.5GT

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    131
    16
    Columbus
    i'll chime in with my extra information/opinion. I agree with everyone above, but most people agree that a BOB is a 72 hour bag/kit. I cannot imagine needing to carry enough stuff for 72 hours to necessitate needing a frame. My current BOB configuration is running about 35lbs and i use a Camelback Motherload for it. It has a nice beefy waist belt so you can get the weight off your shoulders. I would suggest it to anyone looking for a 3 day bag.
     

    swatdoc

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 20, 2009
    217
    16
    Franklin
    The military have always been fans of the rigid frame approach. First with the Alice pack and later the Molle system. They have the advantage of being fairly stout and able to carry a fairly heavy load. I won't say comfort is their forte. The early Molle ruck frames were prone to breakage. The latest generation are supposedly better. However, I'm still a fan of the internal frame setup. Check out Kifaru's offerings. They are regarded among the best available.
     

    jeremy

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 18, 2008
    16,482
    36
    Fiddler's Green
    Frames are really only needed if you are going to be carrying heavy awkward loads, or if you will be doing vertical work. If you are not going to be doing either then a frame is not really necessary.

    Internal frames have proven to be more comfortable and slightly more durable than external frames. The biggest advantage to an external frame is they are a little easier to maintain and repair.
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Latest posts

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,670
    Messages
    9,956,622
    Members
    54,907
    Latest member
    DJLouis
    Top Bottom