SavageEagle
Grandmaster
- Apr 27, 2008
- 19,568
- 38
The way it originally was in the Constitution, where Senators were elected by state legislatures. It gave the states a method to have "a say" in the running of the federal government - something which was completely removed by the 17th.
The other method that the federal government has quite successfully used is to claim that "the militia," as mentioned in the 2nd, only pertains to the National Guard. Of course, it is not used in the same paragraph as any mention of the nearly constant federalization of the Guard, so that, rather than taking orders from the state's governor, they take orders only from the president (through the usual active-duty chain of command). The is no mention of the distinction between "select militia" and "unorganized militia."
The individual states have been completely removed from the equation in both issues.
I just wanted to add to this. The word Militia is meant to distinguish such forces from military forces. Militias were (still should be in my opinion) made up of ordinary citizens. They didn't get paid and there was no fixed term of service. Militia was to Millitary as Volunteer Fireman is to Fireman. For some reason Militia has come to receive a lot more scary perception in popular culture than it historically deserves. The British were using militia back in the 1300's when every able bodied man got together in the village commons once a month to practice with their longbows. Now due to various social pressures our culture is making it politically incorrect to even talk openly about Militia.
And anyone referring to themselves as one quickly gets made fun of or shunned as freaks.
In the vernacular of the day, the phrase "well-regulated" referred to the degree of training and preparedness, not to governmental legislation, oversight, or control. A "well-regulated" Militia group was expected to train to the same degree of proficiency as regular army troops, turn out for muster with their gear squared away and a serious, teachable attitude.
Have you come a cross any militias that have earned anything different?
Please list a few examples.
This.
Basically the militia that is recognized by the State and follows the mandates of the State, but is not part of the National Guard. It used to be the National Guard, but they were Federalized. Essentially taking the Militia's away from the states. Indiana has such a militia, though, I don't remember their website. They did come here recruiting at one point but everyone flamed them away.
Of course, the unorganized militia is us. All of us. 17-75.
They did come here recruiting at one point but everyone flamed them away.
There are a few different organizations that all claim to be the "official" Indiana State Militia. So far, none of them have passed the first and simplest litmus test for legitimacy: does the Governor recognize your group?
Until and unless the Governor of the State of Indiana actually recognizes a militia group, it is an illegitimate group--since the militia answers to the Governor.
From the reading I have been doing I think that this is a correct answer.
They did come here recruiting at one point but everyone flamed them away.
The Indiana Guard Reserve is an official select militia.
The Indiana Guard Reserve is an official select militia.
If you recall, the guy who came here "recruiting" managed to get himself flamed away by announcing that he would instruct his troops to take from homeowners whatever food & supplies they required.
There are a few different organizations that all claim to be the "official" Indiana State Militia. So far, none of them have passed the first and simplest litmus test for legitimacy: does the Governor recognize your group?
Until and unless the Governor of the State of Indiana actually recognizes a militia group, it is an illegitimate group--since the militia answers to the Governor.
The concept of an "official militia" is somewhat of a contradiction in terms, I think.