This story is at least 15 years old. NBC did a hit piece about it back in the mid-'90's. Might there be a problem in which under some circumstances the gun fires without the trigger being touched. Yes, I think there might be, any mechanical device can fail due to wear, abuse, neglect or any numbers of factors. All of the injuries and deaths mentioned were NOT caused by the gun. There were caused by stupid, selfish, lazy, negligent users who could not use enough common sense not to point a loaded high power rifle at a friend of loved or at a plasterboard wall with a friend or loved one on the other side. It's easier to blame an inanimate object than to accept their own guilt.
I agree but what about the final vid of the police sniper? What IF the gun was not altered or molested in any way?This story is at least 15 years old. NBC did a hit piece about it back in the mid-'90's. Might there be a problem in which under some circumstances the gun fires without the trigger being touched. Yes, I think there might be, any mechanical device can fail due to wear, abuse, neglect or any numbers of factors. All of the injuries and deaths mentioned were NOT caused by the gun. There were caused by stupid, selfish, lazy, negligent users who could not use enough common sense not to point a loaded high power rifle at a friend of loved or at a plasterboard wall with a friend or loved one on the other side. It's easier to blame an inanimate object than to accept their own guilt.
I agree but what about the final vid of the police sniper? What IF the gun was not altered or molested in any way?
AGAIN, I totally agree with you. This does not get Remington off the hook though because you simply can't have a rifle that discharges when you touch the bolt (if it really is that way from the factory.) I suspect a large number have had trigger jobs, etc.What if it wasn't? Recall my comment, "any mechanical device can fail due to wear, abuse, neglect or any numbers of factors." It still doesn't mean you point your rifle at your child while you manipulate the safety (as one woman did who fatally shot her 10 year old). The only "safety" any gun has is between your ears, if that fails that whose fault is it?
AGAIN, I totally agree with you. This does not get Remington off the hook though because you simply can't have a rifle that discharges when you touch the bolt (if it really is that way from the factory.) I suspect a large number have had trigger jobs, etc.
With that in mind, what IF a brand new Rem 700 is discharging when a round is chambered and the trigger is not touched? That would be an extremely serious issue, right?
This is just step 1 in proving to anti gunners that guns go off on their own and it's dangerous to have one in public.
I feel bad for the victims of the shots, but if the muzzle was ALWAYS pointed in a safe direction, ESPECIALLY if it is known to be loaded. *shakes head* There ARE reason for safe firearm practices...
Even when I'm not touching it, my firearms are pointed away from anyone in the house.
Wow. We disagree BIG TIME. I can't imagine how anyone could call a round through your roof, over the backstop, in the floor "an annoyance".It would be an annoyance, and cause for examination.
Wow. We disagree BIG TIME. I can't imagine how anyone could call a round through your roof, over the backstop, in the floor "an annoyance".
Just stop cycling rounds through high powered rifles in your living room and you won't have to worry about it.
Remington's response to CNBC's hit-piece is now online at Remington
http://rem.brandednews.com/pdf/Remington_Vendor_Release.pdf