remauto1187
Shooter
Overcome the resistive loss with BIGGER wire. Transistor control will take care of the DC/AC mirrored control. Big blovking diode will keep the AC out the DC side. A PLC can be your "centralized controller" and are in thousands of factories. I have a box of them. Want one?Due to resistive losses, the power delivery conductors for DC still need to be kept relatively short. The only reason I'd wire my house up for DC power delivery from a centralized location would be if I had some form of RE energy that started life as DC in the first place. I am contemplating a way to switch all of my DC lighting loads over to a centralized battery bank for a form of home UPS system for lighting only in the event of a power outage such that the lighting functionality at the switch location would remain identical AC or DC, but without local power generation in the form of wind or solar, that would be pointless for the moment. Until then, the lighting power will be kept AC to the switch and then converted to DC in the room where it will be used.
I'm also a little leery of going full smart-house where the switches on the wall do nothing with regard to the lighting loads themselves, but rather just signal the central computer to actuate a relay in the equipment closet. I did dig this hack on Hack-a-Day a couple of weeks ago: Remote Servo-controlled Lightswitch. Light switch functionality remains identical, but the central controller could exert itself on your behalf if you program it to.