With that rig, there go the aerodynamics.....that's a sailboat.Not if you have one of the good ones.
View attachment 37579
With that rig, there go the aerodynamics.....that's a sailboat.Not if you have one of the good ones.
View attachment 37579
See, this depends on the officer.... I'm never sure whether to crack a joke or show them my t**s... Seems like I always choose incorrectly.
True... Not useless. They are very helpful in detecting speed traps from 1996.
Because when I see a car that I visually estimate to be speeding, I then click-on my radar antenna and verify it's actual speed. Takes a fraction of a second and is not possible for you to react to the warning your fuzz-buster emits in that fraction of a second. Constant-on radar is about the only thing a fuzz-buster will protect you from.
I suppose it would serve as a warning to someone with a detector, but then again so do my blinky lights when I stop the original speeder.
When I work details where I have to write tickets, for speeding I usually give 15-20 over the limit before I stop someone. I don't feel bad writing a ticket for 20 over on city streets.
A good quality detector will give a heads-up if radar is 'flashing' cars ahead of you. Now that we have abandoned the 55 mph limit on country expressways, I tend to find myself within 5 of the posted limit anyway. Maybe I'm just getting old.
I've had multiple tickets since I started driving. 2 points on, 2 points drop, 2 on, 2 drop..... insurance never cared. Get 6 points, then they pay attention.
Useless
I would have given you a warning with that justification.
Not everybody has instant-on or pop radar, as a matter of fact, once you get away from the large metro areas most of the Sheriff Dept. & City/Town Police have constant-on radars. ISP & some major metro departments are the only ones I'm aware of that have mostly converted to instant-on units.Because when I see a car that I visually estimate to be speeding, I then click-on my radar antenna and verify it's actual speed. Takes a fraction of a second and is not possible for you to react to the warning your fuzz-buster emits in that fraction of a second. Constant-on radar is about the only thing a fuzz-buster will protect you from.
What if the original speeder doesn't hit your "threshold" to get pulled over but the speeder with a radar detector does meet it and you are still on the lookout for speeders when the 2nd guy comes by? Had he not had a radar detector and picked up on your presence when you checked the original speeder he may still be going over your threshold; radar detector saves him a ticket.I suppose it would serve as a warning to someone with a detector, but then again so do my blinky lights when I stop the original speeder.
That's generous! Thanks for being one of the good guys!When I work details where I have to write tickets, for speeding I usually give 15-20 over the limit before I stop someone. I don't feel bad writing a ticket for 20 over on city streets.
Interesting. I've not ever seen one that wasn't substantially more than the ticket + court costs.
Time to change insurance companies.I didn't have any violations on my record for the last 15 years. Got a speeding ticket in Michigan last May (no deferral option) for 5mph over. Saw my insurance premium go up $120 for a 6 month premium.
BTW... 36 years old and just me and my wife on the policy.
I suppose it would serve as a warning to someone with a detector, but then again so do my blinky lights when I stop the original speeder.
When I work details where I have to write tickets, for speeding I usually give 15-20 over the limit before I stop someone. I don't feel bad writing a ticket for 20 over on city streets.
[/FONT]Radar detector.
Useless