Popular Vote

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • dsol

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    May 28, 2009
    1,627
    83
    Jeffersonville
    It would be simple to revise the electoral college. Break it up where one electoral vote is awarded to the winner of each seperate congressional district and then whoever gets the most votes overall in the state gets the two electoral votes for the senate seats. It would never happen as that would take power to control all of Illinois electoral votes just through Chicago and would be a fairer breakdown of the votes to represent the "little people' in the rest of a state.
     

    42769vette

    Grandmaster
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    52   0   0
    Oct 6, 2008
    15,280
    113
    south of richmond in
    The Electoral College is perfect - stop trying to change it.
    It is designed precisely to protect the Republic against the tyranny of the majority, of populism.

    The nature of the process happens to have failed us spectacularly in this instance - or, rather, we have failed ourselves, but the rationale for the Electoral College is very much valid.

    If there is still a Republic worth the having in 2017, then I will be very glad to have it as a final bulwark against populism, although it wasn't enough to save us this time.

    Not that Romney would have been much better, as he still holds many of the same positions, but at least Romney doesn't openly hate everything for which we stand (used to stand??) as a People and as a Nation.

    This is uniquely terrible.


    how did electorial college fail us this time? obama won the popular and the electorial.

    id also like to hear you elaborate on how it is perfect. im defintally no expert on the electorial college so mabye i can learn some thing by your explation
     

    ThrottleJockey

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Oct 14, 2009
    4,934
    38
    Between Greenwood and Martinsville
    Argue and or agree until the cows come home, it won't solve the problem or feed you. I have done a bit of research (still have some more to do of course) and I've come to the conclusion that Guatemala is perhaps a suitable place to wait things out. It may perhaps be the prefect place for a libertarian to avoid the bread lines and watch the world burn! They have gun rights, are free from government intrusion, 55' at night 75' daytime temps average, roughly 25% of the cost of living ....oh, and they aren't taxed to death! What's yours is yours!
     

    hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    Argue and or agree until the cows come home, it won't solve the problem or feed you. I have done a bit of research (still have some more to do of course) and I've come to the conclusion that Guatemala is perhaps a suitable place to wait things out. It may perhaps be the prefect place for a libertarian to avoid the bread lines and watch the world burn! They have gun rights, are free from government intrusion, 55' at night 75' daytime temps average, roughly 25% of the cost of living ....oh, and they aren't taxed to death! What's yours is yours!

    There's a reason Mexicans look down their noses at Guatemalans.
     

    PAMom

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 5, 2011
    200
    16
    Argue and or agree until the cows come home, it won't solve the problem or feed you. I have done a bit of research (still have some more to do of course) and I've come to the conclusion that Guatemala is perhaps a suitable place to wait things out. It may perhaps be the prefect place for a libertarian to avoid the bread lines and watch the world burn! They have gun rights, are free from government intrusion, 55' at night 75' daytime temps average, roughly 25% of the cost of living ....oh, and they aren't taxed to death! What's yours is yours!

    Interesting to me you mention this subject; my neighbor asked me four years ago where would be the best place to go if leaving this country. Unlike me, however, he is a millionaire and can pick and choose where he might go. I believe him to be completely serious.

    I have watched the stories with interest that talk about our 'millionaires and billionaires' leaving this country in larger than normal numbers.

    Guess you and I better buck up and get paying their fair share.:dunno:
     

    NomadS

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 30, 2012
    338
    18
    New Albany, IN
    We'd be better served to return selection of the senate to the legislatures of the several states.

    +1

    the EC also decreases somewhat the possible impact of voter fraud as well. With straight popular vote, one massive fraud location could through the election. With the EC there are usually at least several states that would need to be corrupted.

    The founders probably feared (rightly) straight democracy as much if not more than the other type of tyranny.
     

    NomadS

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 30, 2012
    338
    18
    New Albany, IN
    It would be simple to revise the electoral college. Break it up where one electoral vote is awarded to the winner of each seperate congressional district and then whoever gets the most votes overall in the state gets the two electoral votes for the senate seats. It would never happen as that would take power to control all of Illinois electoral votes just through Chicago and would be a fairer breakdown of the votes to represent the "little people' in the rest of a state.

    Michael Medved was talking about this on the radio. Sounds like it might be a compromise that should be considered. Can anyone think of any unintended consequences this might cause?
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Michael Medved was talking about this on the radio. Sounds like it might be a compromise that should be considered. Can anyone think of any unintended consequences this might cause?

    Whew, I don't know. If something like this would become law, you'd see a lot of gerrymandering.
    I like the system the way it is. For all of our elections, only 4 times has the popular vote winner not won the office.
     

    dbrier

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jun 17, 2008
    769
    28
    Indianapolis IN
    And that is 4 too many. The majority of the people want a certain person to be in charge but an odd outdated system makes it someone else. That doesn't seem wrong to you?
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,606
    Messages
    9,954,525
    Members
    54,893
    Latest member
    Michael.
    Top Bottom