1) Look at the thread title. 2) Look at the picture.
Some jokes got elected and stopped being funny so they no longer fit the topic of discussion. That is a perfect example.
1) Look at the thread title. 2) Look at the picture.
If Tootsie Pops taste bitter to you, maybe that brown stuff in the center isn't candy...
If Tootsie Pops taste bitter to you, maybe that brown stuff in the center isn't candy...
Well in INGO politics, yes. Kind of a friendly jab at the whole "tootsie pop" scandal.Political?
Thanks. This will help explain to useful idiots why clinton (either one) is full of more crap than a porto-let at a rock concert.If you are in the army and have a secret clearance as I did when I was a company armorer, you will probably NEVER see a document stamped SECRET. The cursory investigation is just to see if there are any prominent character faults that could be exploited. It would be likely that someone in this situation would not know the nature of classified material. They would know that anything with a caveat stamped on it had to be protected.
When you move into an area where you NEED access to SCI you have a complete background check on the ground to see if there is the smallest indiscretion that you would be want to hide.
When you are "read on" to a compartment you actually read a document that familiarizes you with not only the nature of the information, but also the source and the special caveats related to that compartment.
The most important aspect of that information is the source. If the info is traced back to the source the source dies, either actually or figuratively.
No one who is "read on" can ever say "I didn't understand". I know.
If you are in the army and have a secret clearance as I did when I was a company armorer, you will probably NEVER see a document stamped SECRET. The cursory investigation is just to see if there are any prominent character faults that could be exploited. It would be likely that someone in this situation would not know the nature of classified material. They would know that anything with a caveat stamped on it had to be protected.
The report revealed crew members told Iranian interrogators the top speed of the boats and passwords to their phones and laptops, which violates Navy code of conduct.
“It is clear that some, if not all, crew members provided at least some information to interrogators beyond name, rank, service number and date of birth,” the report said.
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-na-iran-navy-detainment-report-20160630-snap-story.html