Hey Scutter, I heard if I delete system32 from my laptop it will run faster. Is that true?
I've actually done that. It's not good.
Hey Scutter, I heard if I delete system32 from my laptop it will run faster. Is that true?
I was hoping I'd never have to hear "RSLogix" again. Thanks for bringing up an old wound. I used to work on PLC's running Windows NT. I don't need to tell you how scarily-bad most of that PLC software is written. Most PLC's have security holes you could drive a truck through.
"My PC just bluescreened!" is not a Priority 1 emergency that requires a series of 3AM calls to my personal cell phone number. Go to bed. Call me in the morning during normal business hours.
Sounds more like the people that set it up don't know what they are doing. All thy have to do is put them all on the same subnet and you could get to hem all from the same IP address.Scutter, I think your screenshot printers are the same people that developed RSLogix. I'm training on it at work now. We use mostly ethernet to connect to plc's. You have to open one piece of software to see if you can see the processor. We use different ip addresses for different areas so if the laptop isn't on the right ip address, you will never see it. Some equipment has the ip address written down, or you can see it on the scanner. Some of the equipment doens't have it written down so you have no idea what it is. Once you figure out the address you need, you have to change it in the laptop which seems half the time you have to restart the computer. Once it restarts, you have to open the same software to find it, select it, minimize it, and then open yet another piece of software to get into the logic.
All of that and I can buy a printer at walmart, plug in the usb cable, and print.
Sounds more like the people that set it up don't know what they are doing. All thy have to do is put them all on the same subnet and you could get to hem all from the same IP address.
Sounds more like the people that set it up don't know what they are doing. All thy have to do is put them all on the same subnet and you could get to hem all from the same IP address.
We've got at least a few hundred PLC's. I'm computer stupid so I don't know if it's possible to do what you're suggesting.
Wow! I may be profiling, but don't you just sound like the surly IT guy! Wasn't that an SNL skit? I've got enuff prozac to share. Just call me.
I want to believe that the network is VLAN'ed or simply subnetted and that there were sound reasons for doing so. However, clearly there's a huge lack of proper network documentation (and probably a lack of proper network routes, too) and there's no excuse for that.
Yes, it is, although the way in which KLB describes is probably not the most efficient. Depending on the number of devices, you end up with this huge collision domain and you get lots of extra traffic on the network as a result. It ultimately ends up impacting network performance. Breaking the network up into smaller pieces is usually better and you can still get to everything you need to get to. It sounds like the network is probably not well-designed.
I want to believe that the network is VLAN'ed or simply subnetted and that there were sound reasons for doing so. However, clearly there's a huge lack of proper network documentation (and probably a lack of proper network routes, too) and there's no excuse for that.
Yes, it is, although the way in which KLB describes is probably not the most efficient. Depending on the number of devices, you end up with this huge collision domain and you get lots of extra traffic on the network as a result. It ultimately ends up impacting network performance. Breaking the network up into smaller pieces is usually better and you can still get to everything you need to get to. It sounds like the network is probably not well-designed.
You want to believe, but you know better.