Obama Lectures Press on Donald Trump

[Dim Mak]

I wish GW had done the same with him.

 

[oldpink]

I wish GW had done the same with him.

Say what you will about GW, but at least he has an iota of class, quite a contrast to the Finger-Pointer-in-Chief.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich: Peter Schweizer: 9780062369284: Amazon.com: Books

No one expects a hardcore Dem to see it for what it is, though.

You haven't offered any specific cites, and taking the liberty to have looked a little deeper into this book... It appears that a number of allegations were deemed to be false. Can you offer a specific instance that your are talking about, that makes one believe that Clinton has an allegiance to a foreign power?

 

[oldpink]

You haven't offered any specific cites, and taking the liberty to have looked a little deeper into this book... It appears that a number of allegations were deemed to be false. Can you offer a specific instance that your are talking about, that makes one believe that Clinton has an allegiance to a foreign power?

Holy ****!
This seahag was pulling down a quarter of a million dollars for a twenty minute speech, sometime to multi-million business, sometimes for foreign governments, many of them not exactly known for their commitment to freedom.
But keep on believing your moonbat "theories."
I would expect nothing less than dutiful obeisance/

 

[Kutnupe14]

Holy ****!
This seahag was pulling down a quarter of a million dollars for a twenty minute speech, sometime to multi-million business, sometimes for foreign governments, many of them not exactly known for their commitment to freedom.
But keep on believing your moonbat "theories."
I would expect nothing less than dutiful obeisance/

Uhhhh.... so you're saying the allegations that many of the writers points of contention as being false, is incorrect?

Kut (can give cites if you need them)

 

[oldpink]

Uhhhh.... so you're saying the allegations that many of the writers points of contention as being false, is incorrect?

Kut (can give cites if you need them)

Cites?
From the guy who babbles DailyKOS bilge about Manchurian candidates?
Spare me.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Cites?
From the guy who babbles DailyKOS bilge about Manchurian candidates?
Spare me.

Well, "you can lean a horse to water..."

 

[oldpink]

Well, "you can lean a horse to water..."

Mister Pot, I'd like you to meet Mister Kettle.

 

[jamil]

You haven't offered any specific cites, and taking the liberty to have looked a little deeper into this book... It appears that a number of allegations were deemed to be false. Can you offer a specific instance that your are talking about, that makes one believe that Clinton has an allegiance to a foreign power?

Kut, he gave you a source. You claim the allegations made by that source were deemed to be false. By whom? Seems like you owe more cites than he does. If you're going to reject his cite by claiming it's false, shouldn't you have to prove it?

 

[Kutnupe14]

Kut, he gave you a source. You claim the allegations made by that source were deemed to be false. By whom? Seems like you owe more cites than he does. If you're going to reject his cite by claiming it's false, shouldn't you have to prove it?

No, he did not. I asked for a CITE, not a source. A cite comes from source. Simply posting a book title doesn't fit the bill.

But fine, I'll play the game... and we'll see if OldPink reciprocates...

The author of “Clinton Cash” falsely claimed Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State had “veto power” and “could have stopped” Russia from buying a company with extensive uranium mining operations in the U.S. In fact, only the president has such power.

No ?Veto Power? for Clinton on Uranium Deal

Schweizer corrected “seven or eight” passages that were revealed to be inaccurate after the book was released, according to publisher HarperCollins.
Among them, Schweizer says in the original version of the book that TD Bank, a major shareholder in the Keystone XL pipeline, paid Bill Clinton for speeches and then said it would “begin selling its $1.6 billion worth of shares in the massive but potentially still-born [sic] Keystone XL crude pipeline project” after Hillary Clinton left office. But as his source on the sale of TD Bank’s shares, Schweizer used a press release that was revealed to be fake in 2013.

'Clinton Cash' publisher corrects '7 or 8' inaccurate passages - POLITICO

Bill Clinton was not paid for several speeches as reported in a forthcoming book about his family’s foundation, spokespeople for the former president said Tuesday.Clinton Cash, the hotly anticipated book by a conservative researcher out next week, investigates donations to the foundation and alleges a pattern of access or favor in exchange.

....Schweizer’s contention that Digicel had not received USAID grants prior to its involvement with Clinton also appears to be incorrect. According to federal records, Digicel received more than $29,000 in contracts from USAID in 2007 and 2008.
Multiple requests for comment sent to the publisher and to Schweizer were not returned.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/johnstanto...es-book-says-h?utm_term=.rlQbQVj3K#.qiaP62A98

We rate Schweizer’s claim False.

'Clinton Cash' author: Hillary Clinton changed positions on India nuclear deal | PunditFact

But, again, if I may, you don't have a single piece of evidence that she was involved in this deal, that she sent a memo to the person -- the State Department representative who was on this committee and said, hey, we want to approve the Uranium One sale.

Author Peter Schweizer on following the 'Clinton Cash' trail | Fox News

On ABC yesterday, Schweizer was asked if he had proof that Hillary Clinton directly took action to benefit a Clinton Foundation donor from the sale of a uranium mining company. "No, we don't have direct evidence.

First Read: 'Clinton Cash' Author Speaks Out - NBC News

STEPHANOPOULOS: Eight other agencies on board, the secretary of State, Homeland Security, Defense, Commerce... SCHWEIZER: Right.
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
SCHWEIZER: Right.
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- signed off on it. And even though the State Department was one of nine agencies to sign off on it, there's no evidence at all that Hillary Clinton got directly involved in this decision.
SCHWEIZER: Well, I think it warrants further investigation. And there's a couple of things that need to be clarified.

'This Week' Transcript: 'Clinton Cash’ Author Peter Schweizer - ABC News

 

[jamil]

No, he did not. I asked for a CITE, not a source. A cite comes from source. Simply posting a book title doesn't fit the bill.

It is effectively a cite. Everyone knows what's in it. NY Times picked it up and reported on it extensively at the time. You obviously know the accusations made. Probably only took a few minutes to make your list of rebuttals.