Always glad to see the NRA on offense instead of defense.
And it's going to take a lot of concerted and consistent offense (not just by the NRA, but true conservatives everywhere) to gain back the yardage lost since the 1930's.
And it's going to take a lot of concerted and consistent offense (not just by the NRA, but true conservatives everywhere) to gain back the yardage lost since the 1930's
Yeah, and they always leave the fat and bald part, too!!Far too many of them believe in "gun rights for all": as long as the gun is a "valid hunting rifle," "competition pistol," or $4000 shotgun, and also as long as the person who wants the firearm looks like them (middle-age, upper middle class, white guy).
Aw GEEZ! NOW you did it, you mentioned his name! (s at Pro)I have searched this entire thread and not an anti-NRA peep out of Prometheus.
So many times, I didn't even go that far (mail order) and got insulted a lot worse, directly and by insinuation. You get used to it.There are too many people who claim to be "pro gun" who think it's just fine that we can't buy full-auto weapons, can't have short barrel shotguns, etc.
Go talk to someone who claims to fight for gun rights and tell them that you believe people should be allowed to buy full-auto AK47s in the mail, and they will call you crazy.
For me, but not for thee.Far too many of them believe in "gun rights for all": as long as the gun is a "valid hunting rifle," "competition pistol," or $4000 shotgun, and also as long as the person who wants the firearm looks like them (middle-age, upper middle class, white guy).
Ever the optimist, the [STRIKE]Earl of Devonshire[/STRIKE], the [STRIKE]Marquis de Lafayette[/STRIKE], erm... I mean that dude over there with the cowboy boots, .45 and coffee is on our side. Now all we need is John Wayne and Robert Mitchum to show up, and we can't lose.Think of it this way, the '94 AWB was the antis' Stalingrad.
The NRA is doing strategic bombing while Gura is working on the Destruction of Army Group Center.
Many flags against the antis.
Yes, before 1968 one under 21 could do this. This is federal law, not just store policy.
I would speculate that after striking down the 21+ rule for buying pistols from FFLs that 21+ for pistol ammo will be the NRA's next target.
An 18 year old may not purchase an assault rifle.
maa, one of the first cover stories from the SSA/GCA in the early '60s was "juvenile delinquency".
Tim, I don't think I've hit my head . . . recently. What did you read that claimed 18? Did you hear this in a gun shop?
Did a gun dealer say "a-salt raffle" and point to a Title I M4gery?
maa, did you mean Title I or Title II?
I hope they hurry and change it. Im 19 and sick of Hassling with private sellers when all i want is a brand new gun.
+1 Rep inbound!I have searched this entire thread and not an anti-NRA peep out of Prometheus.
Sorry on vacation last week and I do most of my INGO surfing during down time during surgeries.I have searched this entire thread and not an anti-NRA peep out of Prometheus.
^this
Plus its a felony to have someone but a gun for you if they are not a parents or grandparent. The serial number goes down on the other persons file, which means they have to trust that you won't do anything stupid so why not let them? It takes a lot of trust for that and I disagree with it.
I.know my 18 year old would love to see the age reduced from 21. I don't see how Texas gets a betterer grade on gun friendly vs IN. This used to be the wild west, but no more. Too many place you can't carry, there is no open carry. To get a gun license is expensive plus the long course you must complete. Which is why I'm glad I have my Utah.