Sry for the thread hi-jack but why is that?
"sucked" off the deck?
Due to the pressured/flow of blast created by the barrels? Noise wave? ????
the blast wave is leavin' from the round's.......i guess i should have said blowen....
Sry for the thread hi-jack but why is that?
"sucked" off the deck?
Due to the pressured/flow of blast created by the barrels? Noise wave? ????
This is your opinion and you are free to think it but your statement does makes me sad. It show that the american people are at best, spoiled. A little inconvenience and the sky is falling, our rights are being ripped from our hands.
Please explain to me what rights you have lost due to terrorism? and how the 2nd Amendment will help you with an IED? I am fairly sure our troops have much better weapons than we and yet they are affected every day
I will once again, for the proof, state what you said. You desire to push aside political discourse and use the military without the consent of the people to perform acts of violence upon others.
Does diplomacy win? Yes, and it has on many occasions. Do warriors win? Yes, once again, on many occasions. But for warriors to percieve something as being a loss and then suggest "pushing aside" those who aren't winning (in context of your statement, the politicos) and "do the job yourself". What about that is not a clear cut description of a military coup or junta?
I am not trying to "prove someone wrong", I am trying to understand the chest thumping, "kill them all" mindset I see of quite a few online here. A warrior's job is to protect the nation. A politico's job is to represent the nation and command the military to protect the nation and it's interests. The military does not command the politicos and perform it's own actions. I am confused why so many here wish to cause such a horrible ill upon others who meerly want to exist but are forced into such a horrible situation by their unelected, undesired and fear mongering leaders as in the case of NK?
If you take out Kimmy then the military takes over and the people loose all hope because "their god" is dead. It will takes many more generations to make a change.
Well, can't fly commericial to Disneyland without having my family's 4th Amendment rights stripped away, and risking having my wife and/or son sexually assaulted.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Considering the current state of the world, a pat down doesn't seem that unreasonable
So your wife will be raped and your son will be sodomized if you fly? using the term " sexually assaulted" is a bit over the top and very insulting to anyone who has actually been a real victim of assault. Maybe you should go to a victims support group and say that crap, I am sure that a real victim would appreciate it.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Considering the current state of the world, a pat down doesn't seem that unreasonable
I am confused why so many here wish to cause such a horrible ill upon others who meerly want to exist but are forced into such a horrible situation by their unelected, undesired and fear mongering leaders as in the case of NK?
You're probably going to get smacked for that Smitty. I'll explain the difference.
The 4th Amendment guarantees a personal freedom from unreasonable search and seizure without a warrant in the absence of exigent circumstances. Personal. Saying that you are stripping everyone of their right is no less an affront to the Constitution.
On the other hand, you are not required to submit to a search. You don't have to fly. If you do not fly, you are not subject to search.
But there are two issues. First, this starts a slippery slope. Next it will be federal buildings to protect the workers. Then it will be malls to protect the occupants. Your employment. Everywhere you go someone could demand a patdown search, which in reality is a sexual assault. Statute supports that definition, whether you agree or not.
Second, there is no evidence there is an overwhelming government interest to violate or limit the 4th Amendment right to be secure in yourself, your papers, and your property.
NO ONE puts their hands on me unless I deserve it. It's a health risk. I'll avoid airports until this silly rule falls into the "man that was a dumb idea" file.
This is your opinion and you are free to think it but your statement does makes me sad. It show that the american people are at best, spoiled. A little inconvenience and the sky is falling, our rights are being ripped from our hands.
Please explain to me what rights you have lost due to terrorism? and how the 2nd Amendment will help you with an IED? I am fairly sure our troops have much better weapons than we and yet they are affected every day
The Hate America First fire burns on both sides of the candle. Those that have never had to defend freedom scream the loudest for it. And from it. Sad indeed.
You're probably going to get smacked for that Smitty. I'll explain the difference.
The 4th Amendment guarantees a personal freedom from unreasonable search and seizure without a warrant in the absence of exigent circumstances. Personal. Saying that you are stripping everyone of their right is no less an affront to the Constitution.
On the other hand, you are not required to submit to a search. You don't have to fly. If you do not fly, you are not subject to search.
But there are two issues. First, this starts a slippery slope. Next it will be federal buildings to protect the workers. Then it will be malls to protect the occupants. Your employment. Everywhere you go someone could demand a patdown search, which in reality is a sexual assault. Statute supports that definition, whether you agree or not.
Second, there is no evidence there is an overwhelming government interest to violate or limit the 4th Amendment right to be secure in yourself, your papers, and your property.
NO ONE puts their hands on me unless I deserve it. It's a health risk. I'll avoid airports until this silly rule falls into the "man that was a dumb idea" file.
In case it missed your notice in history class, McArthur couldn't get the job done. It wasn't a matter of politics, either. It was a matter of man vs. man and the Chinese and NK's had a decided advantage in that area. The NK's still do. Folks who think that going to war on the peninsula is some kind of good idea need to seriously rethink their position. Especially, if they aren't going to be fighting.