State lawmakers fail in attempt at gun reform bill
The changes to the bill would have mandated universal background checks and a ban on the sale of assault weapons.
www.wthr.com
I have no idea, bit if someone thinks that we should not have it, I automatically decide that I want it.The hell is "35-burst fire"?
State lawmakers fail in attempt at gun reform bill
The changes to the bill would have mandated universal background checks and a ban on the sale of assault weapons.www.wthr.com
I don't know, but I damn sure want oneThe hell is "35-burst fire"?
Selective fire Remington Model 8 in .35 Remington. It has the Frank Hamer 20 round magazine.The hell is "35-burst fire"?
Made up nonsense because, as usual, gun banners have no clue about the things they want to ban.The hell is "35-burst fire"?
Selective fire Remington Model 8 in .35 Remington. It has the Frank Hamer 20 round magazine.
The hell is "35-burst fire"?
I thought they were referring to the F-35. Cuz I'd really like a GAU-22...
Oh, look: proposed measures that would have had exactly zero impact on the violent act that the measures are allegedly in response to.State Representative Ed DeLaney (D-Indianapolis) and State Senator Eddie Melton (D-Gary) were hoping to revamp Senate Bill 413 as a new gun reform bill in response to the mass shooting at the FedEx facility in Indianapolis.
The changes to the bill would have mandated universal background checks for gun sales and set legal penalties for failure to comply. They would also have instituted a ban on the sale of assault weapons, as defined by the report as selective-fire firearms capable of fully automatic, semiautomatic or 35-burst fire at the option of the user.
In the last paragraph of that article, it states that Republicans in the Senate passed Senate Resolution 39 on April 9th. So, there is some GOOD news in that article. Check out the Senate Resolution 39State lawmakers fail in attempt at gun reform bill
The changes to the bill would have mandated universal background checks and a ban on the sale of assault weapons.www.wthr.com
Unfortunately, a Senate Resolution is, essentially, meaningless. It has no legal weight. It is all bark, no bite - all hat, no cattle.In the last paragraph of that article, it states that Republicans in the Senate passed Senate Resolution 39 on April 9th. So, there is some GOOD news in that article. Check out the Senate Resolution 39
(I searched and couldn't find a link or thread to SR 39, so sorry if it's a dupe)
Sure, resolutions have no teeth but at least you get an idea on where your Senator stands on 2nd Amendment issues. But as we've seen in the past by others, it doesn't MEAN they'll vote to support the 2nd.Unfortunately, a Senate Resolution is, essentially, meaningless. It has no legal weight. It is all bark, no bite - all hat, no cattle.
A senate resolution doesn't tell me diddly squat about where my Senator stands on 2nd Amendment issues. To the contrary, the senate passing a toothless resolution while spiking a bona fide 2A bill tells me exactly where Senators stand on 2nd Amendment issues. The resolution is nothing more than chaff - a distraction from their refusal to advance an actual, pro-2A bill.Sure, resolutions have no teeth but at least you get an idea on where your Senator stands on 2nd Amendment issues. But as we've seen in the past by others, it doesn't MEAN they'll vote to support the 2nd.
Me Too!I don't know, but I damn sure want one
I have blue prints for a guillotine. I'm not real handy so I will need someone with good carpentry skills to help me out. We are going to need it some day.Need to make tar and feathers Great Again.