Monroe County Sheriff R. Lutz -1

[Titanium_Frost]

I really need to start looking at that. If you haven't seen the OC/CC argument thread in 3 years i guess there is never a good time.

BINGO! Because they are not looking for education or even an argument, they just want people to know how THEY feel about it because THEIR feelings are what matters and everyone should care what THEY think about what WE do.

Did I put enough emphasis in that post?

 

[ATM]

Guys, he has been a member since '09 and his very first post was negative of OC, don't waste your breath...

lol, forgot about that one.

Oddly enough, I responded to that old post as well.

 

[Titanium_Frost]

lol, forgot about that one.

Oddly enough, I responded to that old post as well.

It was classic:

ATM: I'm waiting for the "element of surprise"

Im4the2nd: I don't want to give up the element of surprise!

ATM: THAT didn't take long!

 

[LockStocksAndBarrel]

It was classic:

ATM: I'm waiting for the "element of surprise"

Im4the2nd: I don't want to give up the element of surprise!

ATM: THAT didn't take long!

Don't forget that you will be the first one shot if you OC!

 

[Titanium_Frost]

Don't forget that you will be the first one shot if you OC!

You should go to Iam4the2nd's first post, that was what I was paraphrasing.

 

[HICKMAN]

My bad! Georgia

ah, Glock country!

Was born at Fort Gordon and later stationed at Fort Gillem, love me some Stone Mountain and ATL Braves!

 

[LockStocksAndBarrel]

You should go to Iam4the2nd's first post, that was what I was paraphrasing.

I saw what you did there, TF. I just can't find my purple button nor can I resist my tendency toward smartassiness.

 

[Titanium_Frost]

I saw what you did there, TF. I just can't find my purple button nor can I resist my tendency toward smartassiness.

Smartassiness approved, carry on.

 

[G-Niner]

"nor can I resist my tendency toward smartassiness"

I've noticed a lot of that lately.

 

[japartridge]

 

[Rookie]

No idea what you're talking about...

 

[Rookie]

And for future reference, proper grammar would be smartassedness.

 

[LockStocksAndBarrel]

And for future reference, proper grammar would be smartassedness.

But in not smartassed. Im smartassy.

 

[Hayseed_40]

Smartassiness approved, carry on.

Seems to be leaning more towards dumbassiness

 

[Bill B]

But in not smartassed. Im smartassy.

I annoint thee saint Ingo of smartassisi.

 

[LockStocksAndBarrel]

I annoint thee saint Ingo of smartassisi.

Watch it there, Hayseed. I easily.

 

[Boost Lee]

You (and everyone) should only use this as more motivation to help our own LEO understand the law better around LTCH.

I'll even go as far as saying that Sheriff Deputy Lutz may not be a bad officer... Just an uninformed one.
I for see most of these situations go like this because most LEO's would have a hard time admitting to being wrong during a "stop".

I think you handled it well. Whether or not the Deputy agreed or even believed you, it WILL be in the back of his mind with what you said until
he's told otherwise or finds out the hard way. It's all about knowledge, unfortunately.

 

[japartridge]

You (and everyone) should only use this as more motivation to help our own LEO understand the law better around LTCH.

I'll even go as far as saying that Sheriff Deputy Lutz may not be a bad officer... Just an uninformed one.
I for see most of these situations go like this because most LEO's would have a hard time admitting to being wrong during a "stop".

I think you handled it well. Whether or not the Deputy agreed or even believed you, it WILL be in the back of his mind with what you said until
he's told otherwise or finds out the hard way. It's all about knowledge, unfortunately.

I agree that he may not be a bad officer due to ignorance of the law, however the blatant attempt to intimidate me speaks otherwise.

 

[Bunnykid68]

You (and everyone) should only use this as more motivation to help our own LEO understand the law better around LTCH.

I'll even go as far as saying that Sheriff Deputy Lutz may not be a bad officer... Just an uninformed one.
I for see most of these situations go like this because most LEO's would have a hard time admitting to being wrong during a "stop".

I think you handled it well. Whether or not the Deputy agreed or even believed you, it WILL be in the back of his mind with what you said until
he's told otherwise or finds out the hard way. It's all about knowledge, unfortunately.

I disagree with this 1000%. When any LEO claims they worry about ¨officer safety¨ and other such nonsense concerning weapons they damn well should know the laws about weapons since it seems to be of such concern for them. They pack around numerous weapons and that concerns me but I cannot just walk up and question them about my safety.

IGNORANCE of the law is no excuse, any officer writing you a citation or arresting your ass will tell you as much.

 

[finity]

Good luck with your well deserved complaint.