17 squirrel
Shooter
- May 15, 2013
- 4,427
- 63
Most likely I'll get perma- banned before I hit the 7 year anniversary.
However, the suspect made the deadly force decision for the officer when he decided to assault him.
I do not understand this line of reasoning. The officer did not pull the kid over and then open fire on him as the punishment for it. This society LOVES to remove blame from the those who deserve it the most. Could the officer have dealt with the guy differently? Sure. However, the suspect made the deadly force decision for the officer when he decided to assault him.
If that was your child, would you feel the same way?
.
I don't know what video the rest of you watched but the one I saw clearly depicted a murder. I could easily defend that too but in another thread I made a comment about casting pearls before swine, so I better leave the rest of my opinions unsaid.
Did you miss the part where the kid attacked the officer?
As a younger man I had a K5 Blazed lifted up a few inches and a light bar on the roof with 5 KC Daylighters mounted on it.
4 were pointed forward and the center one facing backwards. When dealing with the drivers that would not turn off there high beams, I would flash my headlights and or brake lights twice. Nothing says turn your high beams off like 4 million candle power coming towards you, or a million candle power blinding you from the truck that you are following with your high beams on.
Im confused. The kid did not break the law according to what people posted on here. There is no law regarding flashing lights in Michigan. Cop pulls kid over for flashing lights. Is this against the law? Can a cop pull someone over for no reason? Once cop pulled him over he asked for license and registration or what ever if you did not break a law and the cop is not saying why he pulled you over do you have to give him your info? Last can you be detained if you did not break the law? And if so where is the freedom? If a cop can detain you for no reason then you are guilty till proven innocent correct? Can a lawyer or cop plz answerer these questions cause I would like to know for my own info.
Yes Frank, I see you. That's nice. I recognize that you are passive-aggressively calling me a 'tard...... Subtle. (well, ok your response is sort of amusing even if wrong) I think we both should sit this one out. If either one of us posted our true feelings on this one..... Well, I know MY feelings on this one would certainly get me banned. I'm sure you are adamant with the opposing view.
I do not understand this line of reasoning. The officer did not pull the kid over and then open fire on him as the punishment for it. This society LOVES to remove blame from the those who deserve it the most. Could the officer have dealt with the guy differently? Sure. However, the suspect made the deadly force decision for the officer when he decided to assault him.
Simply stated, This wouldn't be my child. If you actually raise your kids to be a respectful member of this great country, this doesn't happen. This kid learned to be a dip**** from someone and I'm willing to bet it was his parents. I feel the same about this as I do about the thugs shot by police or rival thugs on the evening news. The moms typically on tv saying, "Why'd the police shoot him, he was a good boy, the cop should have stayed in the car." If you had raised him to not he a peace of ****, he'd still be here. I feel for the LEO.
Yep then the rest is null. The kid should have listened. It is still messed up though the cop could have done WAY better. It is his job. The kid was a kid. If I shot every kid that did not listen there would be no humans left.Even if you can flash to warn, you can't have your brights on at night with opposing traffic present regardless of how long they are on. Failure to dim.Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 257.700 (West)