That's literally the opposite of totality of the circumstances and your conclusion was contraindicated by some of the components you chose to ignore.
You remind me of the guy acting as his own attorney in a deposition who kept asking me what one thing lead me to arrest him. "The contents of this case file". Same thing.
If I remind you of someone you do not like, it sounds like I don't have a fair chance at being heard objectively. What components did I choose to ignore?