This makes no sense to me. Many high profile restaurants and bars have gone no-smoking on their own. Slippery noodle being a recent one.
WTF does the state know what's best for the business owner?
This makes no sense to me. Many high profile restaurants and bars have gone no-smoking on their own. Slippery noodle being a recent one.
WTF does the state know what's best for the business owner?
More authoritarians getting their jollies.
It's for the [STRIKE]illegal aliens working in the kitchen[/STRIKE] children.
I cannot understand for the life of me why it is the government's business to tell any restaurant/bar owner how to run their business. I thought the point of capitalism was to let the market decide what businesses are succesful.
Me thinks we're under the guise of capitolism.I cannot understand for the life of me why it is the government's business to tell any restaurant/bar owner how to run their business. I thought the point of capitalism was to let the market decide what businesses are succesful.
Ah, yes. I see.
Fried foods are next. Sorry Timmy, that french cancer fry is illegal.
Those who are so concerned about the rights of the business/property owner, what are your views on the "being able to take your gun on another person's property if they employ you" law?
I agree, govt. owned property on the other hand.... all bets are offEntirely consistent: my property, my rules; your property, your rules.
Can you further clarify your statement. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Why did you strike through kitchen workers? They would be least likely to be exposed to tobacco smoke. None the less, the carcinogens released from standing over a grill all night dwarf that of a server. Chefs are well aware of this fact.
Those who are so concerned about the rights of the business/property owner, what are your views on the "being able to take your gun on another person's property if they employ you" law?
Those who are so concerned about the rights of the business/property owner, what are your views on the "being able to take your gun on another person's property if they employ you" law?