Man removed by PD for carrying at St. Joe County polls

[goinggreyfast]

Count me in!

 

[BlueEagle]

I'm in. We need to support this guy all the way through this.

 

[ATM]

I know you are talking about the state schools, but sadly, there is a major private university in SB that doesn't allow firearms on campus...

Doesn't matter. There is no legal restriction on carrying at private universities either, simply rules which may get you asked to leave as a visitor.

Post secondary education is not considered school property per Indiana Code.

 

[KG1]

Clay has my support all the way.

 

[NDguido]

Doesn't matter. There is no legal restriction on carrying at private universities either, simply rules which may get you asked to leave as a visitor.

Post secondary education is not considered school property per Indiana Code.

Agreed.....but they are exempt from having to allow an employee to have a weapon in their vehicle on their property.

 

[jeremy]

Agreed.....but they are exempt from having to allow an employee to have a weapon in their vehicle on their property.

Could you provide a Citation for that...

 

[lovemachine]

i (clay's big brother) have created a facebook page supporting him and will try to keep it updated with current info:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/435282603167094/

Joined!

 

[rockhopper46038]

Agreed.....but they are exempt from having to allow an employee to have a weapon in their vehicle on their property.

All of them, or only those on the "approved" list?

 

[ATM]

Agreed.....but they are exempt from having to allow an employee to have a weapon in their vehicle on their property.

I believe they were all exempted from the parking lot law, even the state universities.

I'll go verify.

ETA: List found in IC 21-7-13-6. It covers a whole mess of them if not all, many by name but others by generalized defaults.

So still not a crime, but no protection for employees against enforcement of rules.

 

[NDguido]

I believe they were all exempted from the parking lot law, even the state universities.

I'll go verify.

ETA: List found in IC 21-7-13-6. It covers a whole mess of them if not all, many by name but others by generalized defaults.

So still not a crime, but no protection for employees against enforcement of rules.

It appears that is the case.

_____​

DIGEST OF HB 1065 (Updated January 20, 2010 5:30 pm - DI 52)​

Citations Affected: IC 10-14; IC 34-6; IC 34-28; IC 35-47.


Synopsis: Various provisions concerning firearms. Prohibits a person, including an individual, a corporation, and a governmental entity, from adopting or enforcing a policy or rule that prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting an individual from legally possessing a firearm that is locked in the individual's vehicle while the vehicle is in or on the person's property. Excepts possession of a firearm: (1) on school property, on property used by a school for a school function, or on a school bus; (2) on certain child care and shelter facility property; (3) on penal facility property; (4) in violation of federal law; (5) on property belonging to an approved postsecondary educational institution; (6) at a person's residence; (7) on the property of a domestic violence shelter; and (8) on the property of an entity subject to the United States Department of Homeland Security's Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards or the Maritime Transportation Security Act. Provides that a court does not have jurisdiction over an action that: (1) is brought against an employer who is in compliance with the prohibition against adoption or enforcement of a policy or rule that prohibits the possession of a firearm in a locked vehicle; and (2) is brought to recover for any injury or damage resulting from the employer's compliance. Authorizes a civil action for damages, costs, attorney's fees, and injunctive relief to remedy a violation. Prohibits the state, a political subdivision, or any other person from prohibiting or restricting the lawful possession, transfer, sale, transportation, storage, display, or use of firearms or ammunition during a declared disaster emergency, energy emergency, or local disaster emergency, subject to exceptions that apply to the prohibition against adoption or enforcement of a policy or rule that prohibits the possession of a firearm in a locked vehicle. Repeals provisions that allow certain political subdivisions to adopt emergency ordinances to regulate firearms if a local disaster emergency has been declared. Deletes an outdated reference.
Effective: July 1, 2010.

 

[Vince49]

Request sent.

Sent Clay a request to join on fb.

 

[Hammerhead]

sight site cite Awwww, who cares?

Really? There's talk of boobs, and you pick up on the typo?

 

[TTravis]

Requested to join facebook groop. I may not be from that area, but they are trampling on the laws of our entire state.

 

[Kev]

Sent request to join the FB support as well! Count in a fellow South Bend/Lydick native.

 

[AndersonIN]

I've just now requestered them also too!

 

[Kev]

Up to 344 members on the FB site!

 

[GuyRelford]

Today, the Law Offices of Guy A. Relford filed a Verified Petition Requesting the Appointment of a Special Prosecutor to conduct an independent investigation as to whether various criminal election laws were violated when St. Joseph County officials refused to allow Clay to vote.

More news to follow.

Guy

 

[KLB]

Today, the Law Offices of Guy A. Relford filed a Verified Petition Requesting the Appointment of a Special Prosecutor to conduct an independent investigation as to whether various criminal election laws were violated when St. Joseph County officials refused to allow Clay to vote.

More news to follow.

Guy

 

[jeremy]

Get 'em Guy!!!

 

[TaunTaun]

We have a gunshop of the year on here. What about 2nd Amendment attorneys? hehe