Man faces up to 90 years in prison for state-licensed marijuana greenhouse

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    Gimme a C
    Gimme an O
    Gimme an N
    Gimme an S
    Gimme a T
    Gimme an I

    Oh wait, it's about druggies. Pack the pompons and let's go.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Gimme a C
    Gimme an O
    Gimme an N
    Gimme an S
    Gimme a T
    Gimme an I

    Oh wait, it's about druggies. Pack the pompons and let's go.

    It doesn't require actual belief in the Constitution to use it when convenient on occasion to prove a point. It amazes me how often that distinction between actual adherence and occasional convenient lip service gets overlooked.
     

    griffin

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 30, 2011
    2,064
    36
    Okemos, MI
    Our sheriffs need to read this book: http://www.amazon.com/The-County-Sheriff-Americas-Last/dp/B002PKCMFO


    51KwXTP6H6L._SL500_.jpg


    Mack believes a sheriff’s authority is so great that he or she doesn’t have to obey the president.

    .
     
    Last edited:

    griffin

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 30, 2011
    2,064
    36
    Okemos, MI
    A local Sheriff here is part of a nationwide movement that sees the county sheriff as the last line of defense against an overreaching federal government. The sheriff has the power to stand in the way and can help restore the U.S. Constitution as the “supreme law of the land.”

    The sheriff said it would be his duty to turn away a federal agent from the county — including an IRS auditor — if the agency was overstepping its bounds.

    http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012110250010
     

    Bunnykid68

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Mar 2, 2010
    23,515
    83
    Cave of Caerbannog
    A local Sheriff here is part of a nationwide movement that sees the county sheriff as the last line of defense against an overreaching federal government. The sheriff has the power to stand in the way and can help restore the U.S. Constitution as the “supreme law of the land.”

    The sheriff said it would be his duty to turn away a federal agent from the county — including an IRS auditor — if the agency was overstepping its bounds.

    http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012110250010

    Maybe that is why all of these cites want consolidation
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    10 of the Harshest Sentences for Pot in the U.S.

    1. Christopher Williams
    A Montana medical marijuana provider is facing 82 to 85 years behind bars, due to mandatory minimum laws linked to some of his charges. Convicted of crimes like manufacturing marijuana, intent to distribute and possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, Christopher Williams appeared to be in the for the worst. But in a rare move this September, U.S. Attorney Michael Cotter offered to drop four of Williams’ charges and bring his sentencing down to “as little as 10 years,” so long as Williams waived his right to appeal.

    Williams refused the offer on moral grounds. The case isn’t about medical pot, says Williams, whose judge prohibited discussion of Montana’s medical marijuana program at trial. Rather, he says, it is about government abuse of power. “I have decided to fight the federal government, because for me not defending the things that I know are right is dishonorable,” Williams wrote to the Independent Record , “Every citizen has a responsibility to fight for what is right, even if it seems like the struggle will be lost.”

    Michael Donahoe, Williams’ attorney, said that federal prosecutors often bring gun charges against medical marijuana defendants without the intent to prosecute them. Rather, they are hoping for a plea bargain -- one Williams is not willing to take.

    “We know this for two reasons,” Donahoe told the Missoulan, “First, because the government readily agreed to dismiss the firearms counts for virtually every other medical marijuana defendant in those cases where firearms violations had been charged. And second, because insofar as [Williams’] ‘conspiracy’ is concerned, every other defendant had no real choice but to plead guilty in exchange for the firearms charges being dropped.”

    He added, “Given the government’s conduct here that was a false choice inspired by an abusive exercise of government power, considering that it was the government’s reckless decision to change its medical marijuana policy that was the first cause of all these problems.”
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,179
    149
    Valparaiso
    State law is state law and federal law is federal law. The state choosing to make something legal or illegal is irrelevant to whether the federal government makes it illegal. The feds don't have to make something legal just be cause a state does. I have some questions about the application of the interstate commerce clause, but it was well known that the feds still held the marijuana trade illegal.
     

    jon159753

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Jun 12, 2011
    171
    16
    Avon, IN
    Once enough states are for the weed then the fed might come around. Untill then..... dont grow big. and mind state lines.

    The thing I find funny is that med MJ is legal in DC.... WTF?
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Back when he was running in 2008, Obama said he supported the “basic concept of using medical marijuana for the same purposes and with the same controls as other drugs” and that he was “not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws.”

    Read more: Obama's pot promise a pipe dream? - Byron Tau - POLITICO.com

    This is an excellent example of why we should not take comfort in any application of law enforcement based on some form of salutary neglect. It is changeable at any time without any warning whatsoever, somewhat like the asset forfeiture laws which we were told were aimed at drying up the bottomless pockets of the drug vendors and in practice have become a way of stealing from any and all who are so brazed as to possess green cash or to fail to do background checks on all patrons who stay in their hotels, among other 'offenses'.
     
    Top Bottom