Notavictim646
Sharpshooter
I understand that. That doesn't change the complete lack of Constitutional justification for this act to exist.
Agreed. I bet there are a lot of attorneys in California trying to get a straight answer as well.
I understand that. That doesn't change the complete lack of Constitutional justification for this act to exist.
Gimme a C
Gimme an O
Gimme an N
Gimme an S
Gimme a T
Gimme an I
Oh wait, it's about druggies. Pack the pompons and let's go.
A local Sheriff here is part of a nationwide movement that sees the county sheriff as the last line of defense against an overreaching federal government. The sheriff has the power to stand in the way and can help restore the U.S. Constitution as the “supreme law of the land.”
The sheriff said it would be his duty to turn away a federal agent from the county — including an IRS auditor — if the agency was overstepping its bounds.
http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012110250010
Gimme a C
Gimme an O
Gimme an N
Gimme an S
Gimme a T
Gimme an I
Oh wait, it's about druggies. Pack the pompons and let's go.
1. Christopher Williams
A Montana medical marijuana provider is facing 82 to 85 years behind bars, due to mandatory minimum laws linked to some of his charges. Convicted of crimes like manufacturing marijuana, intent to distribute and possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, Christopher Williams appeared to be in the for the worst. But in a rare move this September, U.S. Attorney Michael Cotter offered to drop four of Williams’ charges and bring his sentencing down to “as little as 10 years,” so long as Williams waived his right to appeal.
Williams refused the offer on moral grounds. The case isn’t about medical pot, says Williams, whose judge prohibited discussion of Montana’s medical marijuana program at trial. Rather, he says, it is about government abuse of power. “I have decided to fight the federal government, because for me not defending the things that I know are right is dishonorable,” Williams wrote to the Independent Record , “Every citizen has a responsibility to fight for what is right, even if it seems like the struggle will be lost.”
Michael Donahoe, Williams’ attorney, said that federal prosecutors often bring gun charges against medical marijuana defendants without the intent to prosecute them. Rather, they are hoping for a plea bargain -- one Williams is not willing to take.
“We know this for two reasons,” Donahoe told the Missoulan, “First, because the government readily agreed to dismiss the firearms counts for virtually every other medical marijuana defendant in those cases where firearms violations had been charged. And second, because insofar as [Williams’] ‘conspiracy’ is concerned, every other defendant had no real choice but to plead guilty in exchange for the firearms charges being dropped.”
He added, “Given the government’s conduct here that was a false choice inspired by an abusive exercise of government power, considering that it was the government’s reckless decision to change its medical marijuana policy that was the first cause of all these problems.”
Back when he was running in 2008, Obama said he supported the “basic concept of using medical marijuana for the same purposes and with the same controls as other drugs” and that he was “not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws.”
Read more: Obama's pot promise a pipe dream? - Byron Tau - POLITICO.com
The guy was in direct violation of federal drug policies so he gets what's coming to him.
So when Fed Regs say no more civilian semi-autos you'll be first in line to turn yours in, right?
Exactly! It just takes all the fun out of condescension when it hits home, doesn't it?
drugs is against the law! hiccup Lock 'em all up!