... and will have to prove in court...
Nope. Just the prosecutor...
...In court.
IC 35-47-2-24 says "prosecuting attorney". It says nothing about "in court"
We're speaking in technical terms here and according to the actual wording of the IC it doesn't mention anything about where you have to show it to the prosecuting attorney.You show evidence to prosecuting attorneys in court. They don't accept it otherwise. Trust me...
Sorry, I can't just trust you. I've seen evidence presented outside of court which changed a prosecutor's decision to prosecute or not.
We're speaking in technical terms here and according to the actual wording of the IC it doesn't mention anything about where you have to show it to the prosecuting attorney.
Actually I did look but couldn't find the answer... Sorry, I guess I should have been more specific.
Translated from n00b speak:
"Hey guys tell me so I don't have to look it up myself"
Well I will agree that it will probably be the prosecuting attorneys decision on where it will take place.Ok, I can only attest to my own experiences but I had proof that I did not commit an infraction once and had to go to court TWICE before they dismissed it. I guess if you have a friendly prosecutor they could accept your evidence outside of court but I haven't seen it.
Lets just say that it will be likely you will have to go to court, can everyone agree on that?
More specific about what?
Wow you are pretty moody... I did read but there are no definitive answers on this specific topic.
thank you for being so helpful, was that just your way of saying; I don't know the answer to your question?