This is 100% true. You have read POSTS. What I highly doubt you have heard/read is any such comment on a major media outlet. It has become unacceptable to mention race in any way shape or form UNLESS it is making derogatory comments on older white guys or white rednecks. I firmly believe that race should be left completely out of ANY discussion as it should have no bearing on anything. However it is highly annoying that comments such as the one the OP is addressing have become perfectly acceptable and defended. The left has worked hard to make the word WHITE correlate with intolerance,fighting "progress" and stupid. The left are the truly intolerant ones and should be called out on it.
Not exactly.
...why it has become acceptable for the left to be openly racist without repercussion while the right is accused and demonized for it without actually doing it in many cases. The obvious casualty is the truth when it is disregarded based entirely upon who is speaking it. Then again, this applies equally to the attributes of being old and tired, so, in the end, I could truthfully say that this post is as much about age and/or spryness as any other attribute.
The fundamental issue is that the validity of the argument presented is being ignored in favor of criticisms of the speaker that I would think most civilized people would consider to be off limits.
Why is it that everybody is not held to the same standards is what I wonder. Everybody is demanding equality today. Women want to be treated equally, gays want to be treated equally, every ethnic group wants to be treated equally, OK, I am all for it. Lets have the same consequences for the actions of the individuals.
Make an off remark about a woman, you are sexist. Off remark about gays, you are homophobic, an off remark about an ethnic group, you are a racist. Off remark about a white American male, yes we are an intolerant bunch, aren't we?
So, I guess you REALLY believe this, right? I think it's bogus to label someone just because they aren't PC enough, but to each his own.
I am not sure how that even fits in with what I just posted, so, um, OK.
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.
I've read posts where Jesse Jackson and others like him were called everything in the book. If the same thing were said about, let's say, any conservative person of the day, what would happen? Both sides throw stones and then cry over the bruises when they are thrown back.
The words spoken by Martin Luther King Jr.:
This is the best summary of the proper goal that is available. Consistent with this sentiment, I would argue that assigning value or lack of value to another human being based on his ethnic heritage, whatever that may be, is inherently wrong. This would include both criticizing a person on account of his or her ethnicity or defending a person from criticism based on his or her ethnicity, especially by leveling unfair charges of racism at the person offering a criticism which has objective merit. The same applies to any other attribute. Being old does not make a person irrelevant on account of age, nor does it automatically make such a person wise. I have met my share of old idiots, but then again, I have learned much from the experiences of the older people I have known over time. In the end, the critical element is the character of the person and the knowledge, wisdom, and understanding any person brings to the table. Unfortunately, we as a nation are the most polarized we have been since the time in which lynchings were de rigueur, and I find that very disturbing, and strongly advocate finding a workable solution. Making it worse yet is that we are divided along far more different lines than we had been in what are considered with much merit to be our darkest days as a nation.
Equality either does or does not exist. We are either one people or we are not. In order to be one people, our culture must be the melting pot spoken of often in generations past in which one culture is formed from those who make it up, rather than a tossed salad which is a patchwork of pockets of dissimilar and mutually exclusive groups. I believe that King's goal was and is realistic, but that doesn't guarantee that it will happen. Unfortunately, half a century ago, the spokesman on the issue sought to bring people together, as opposed to the opposite goal being carried out by the spokesmen of the present who are agents of division for political gain. Fortunately, we are not compelled to listen to them.
Really? Show me any mainstream media story where that is true. Any at all.