Same size? Umm, not even close. While I do get the allure of the 3at, I prefer the P32. Yeah, a little less power, but greater reliability and last round hold open. Plus, the recoil is very tame.they're good, but why get a .380 when you can get a p11 9mm thats the same size? I carry one in my pocket, its super lightweight, never jams, holds 10+1 rounds of 9mm, and fits in the palm of your hand. ALSO, if you wanna take it a step further, get a couple S&W 95 clips for it, and you have 14 rounds of 9mm in the palm of your hand.....To me it doesn't gte any better than that, as I need a low profile pocket gun. Everybody complains about the trigger, but its really not that bad once you get used to it, plus thats your only "safety" feature, so you wont see me complain.Just my
they're good, but why get a .380 when you can get a p11 9mm thats the same size?
sorry for the repost. accident. But I would have to say there is not a whole lot of major size difference between the two. I've never shot any of the other keltecs tho...
Yeah, what he said. < (Owns a Ranger & a tiny KT)Oh, the P11 is just longer, wider, heavier than the P3AT.
Kinda like an F350 is a little bigger than a Ford Ranger
they're good, but why get a .380 when you can get a p11 9mm thats the same size?