James Reeves - Why the AR-15 Isn't Protected by the Second Amendment

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • bgcatty

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Sep 9, 2011
    3,737
    113
    Carmel
    I really do believe SCOTUS is schizophrenic in its rulings on the 2A. I mean one minute bump stocks do not make a semi auto AR15 into a macinegun and the next AR, are not protected by the 2A as a commonly used gun per Bruen.
    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
     

    Mgderf

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    44   0   0
    May 30, 2009
    18,879
    113
    Lafayette
    I really do believe SCOTUS is schizophrenic in its rulings on the 2A. I mean one minute bump stocks do not make a semi auto AR15 into a macinegun and the next AR, are not protected by the 2A as a commonly used gun per Bruen.
    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
    Scotus remanded this back to the lower courts.
    It ain't over yet.
    Fat lady hasn't sung as yet
     

    bgcatty

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Sep 9, 2011
    3,737
    113
    Carmel
    Scotus remanded this back to the lower courts.
    It ain't over yet.
    Fat lady hasn't sung as yet
    In light of Bruen and Heller, SCOTUS should have made a consistent ruling and just spanked the lower courts and made a favorable 2A ruling to stop this BS of repeated anti 2A lower court rulings.
    Enough is enough! :rockwoot:
     

    Mgderf

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    44   0   0
    May 30, 2009
    18,879
    113
    Lafayette
    In light of Bruen and Heller, SCOTUS should have made a consistent ruling and just spanked the lower courts and made a favorable 2A ruling to stop this BS of repeated anti 2A lower court rulings.
    Enough is enough! :rockwoot:
    Procedure is paramount.
    Look at Roe vs Wade
    It took more than 50 years to rectify that mistake.

    Patience grasshopper.
     

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    95   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    39,007
    113
    Btown Rural
    It almost seems as though the court is swaying back and fourth in a political attempt to avoid criticism?

    A couple/three decisions favorable to the R's, then they think they better waffle on an easy one to balance?

    Shame they didn't think of that when they set the stage to send abortion back to the states? The timing on that decision might well have effected an election, (hopefully not this one also, as a residual?)
     

    fullmetaljesus

    Probably smoking a cigar.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    6,000
    149
    Indy
    When people say **** like this they are just proving their ignorance in regards to understanding language and basic vocabulary. The 2A in the context of the time it was written is pretty ****ing understandable and pretty air tight.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    33,061
    77
    Camby area
    When people say **** like this they are just proving their ignorance in regards to understanding language and basic vocabulary. The 2A in the context of the time it was written is pretty ****ing understandable and pretty air tight.
    Its not ingorance. its:

    1720405773055.png
     
    Top Bottom