- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
They could also submit the article to the proper authorities and wait, say, oh 3-6 months for approval prior to posting said article?
They could also submit the article to the proper authorities and wait, say, oh 3-6 months for approval prior to posting said article?
They could also submit the article to the proper authorities and wait, say, oh 3-6 months for approval prior to posting said article?
How about adding a tax stamp for each article they put on a webpage?
They would only need that on a high traffic website like CNN.com that reaches a large number of visitors. They could still post to small blogs that serve less than 29 visitors a day.
How'd that freedom of the presses thing work out in Venezuela once the guns were outlawed? Oh, I forgot, Hugo was one of the good guys. Never mind.
(A) The Secretary of State’s Office shall create a registry for the registration of persons who qualify as a journalist pursuant to this chapter.
(B) A person seeking to register shall provide all information required by the office including, but not limited to, a criminal record background check, an affidavit from the media outlet attesting to the applicant’s journalistic competence, and an application fee in an amount determined by the office.
(C) A registration is valid for two years and must be renewed within thirty days of expiration.
(D)(1) The Secretary of State’s Office may deny, revoke, or refuse to issue or renew a registration if the office finds that the person:
(a) has filed an application for registration that contains a statement that is false or misleading with respect to a material fact;
(b) has failed to pay the proper application fee or any other fee or penalty imposed pursuant to this chapter; or
(c) has failed to comply with any provision of this chapter.
(2) The Secretary of State’s Office shall deny, revoke, or refuse to issue or renew a registration if a media outlet has determined pursuant to Section 40-85-40 that the person is not competent to be a journalist….
(B) Before working as a journalist for a media outlet in this State, a person shall provide a criminal record background check to the media outlet to determine journalistic competence and register with the South Carolina Responsible Journalism Registry. After registering, the person shall provide a copy of the registration to the media outlet. A person may not work as a journalist until the person provides a copy of a registration to the media outlet.
Section 40-85-40. (A) A person is not competent to be a journalist if:
(1) within the three years before submitting an application for registration, the person has been determined by a court of law to have committed:
(a) libel, slander, or invasion of privacy; or
(b) a felony if the underlying offense was committed to collect, write, or distribute news or other current information for a media outlet; or
(2) as a journalist, the person has demonstrated a reckless disregard of the basic codes and canons of professional journalism associations, including a disregard of truth, accuracy, objectivity, impartiality, fairness, and public accountability, as applicable to the acquisition of newsworthy information and its subsequent dissemination to the public.
Have the progressive drones figured out yet that they were being pwned?
The brighter ones will keep their mouths shut, pretend that this proposed law doesn't exist, and wait for it to blow over because they don't have an effective counterpoint to it.Have the progressive drones figured out yet that they were being pwned?
I think CSGV just broke my irony meter
If hte pen is mightier than the sword...
I like it! He's doing this to prove a point. What OTHER right requires a license to exercise? Once the arguments against this come, those SAME arguments can be used against firearms licensing laws.