I'm sure someone can put up a link, but apparently President Obama uttered that terrible word.
first question, is it ok for President Obama to use that word? Why or why not?
second, would it have been ok for President Bush to utter the same word? Why or why not?
Is it "shenanigans"?
I'm sure someone can put up a link, but apparently President Obama uttered that terrible word.
first question, is it ok for President Obama to use that word? Why or why not?
second, would it have been ok for President Bush to utter the same word? Why or why not?
The first amendment protects freedom of speech so he has every right to use it.
I didn't hear the context, but I generally will respect someone more for using it in a civil discussion of race or language instead of saying "the n word." I think that's a cop out. In order to discuss the use of a particular word, one often has to use said word within the frame of an academic conversation.
What is the big deal? After reviewing it, ANYONE saying what he was saying while using that word would be "ok". A word is just letters grouped together, WE give them meaning. The meaning follows it's use.I'm sure someone can put up a link, but apparently President Obama uttered that terrible word.
first question, is it ok for President Obama to use that word? Why or why not?
second, would it have been ok for President Bush to utter the same word? Why or why not?
I'm not saying it's a big deal to me, but evidently it is to some people.What is the big deal? After reviewing it, ANYONE saying what he was saying while using that word would be "ok". A word is just letters grouped together, WE give them meaning. The meaning follows it's use.
I'm not saying it's a big deal to me, but evidently it is to some people.
My point is "the anointed one" will get a pass where someone else (one of the Presidents Bush, or any other well known or high ranking official, ecspecially one who is white) would probably be ran out of office, fired, or made to "step down" for simply mentioning that set of "letters grouped together"!
I haven't turned on the news yet tonight, but my guess is there will hardly be a mention, but if a white celebrity or official had said the same thing, we wouldn't hear the end of it.
Am I wrong?
I don't think that IS the title. And if it is, and the President agreed to be on that show.... Well, I guess that says something about him!?I also can't help but laugh at anyone up in arms over language on a podcast titled "What the F***? With Marc Maron".
I hope that's an honest answer. Good to hear!Meh, anybody can use that word in the manner the president did. I wouldn't find offense to it.
I hope that's an honest answer. Good to hear!
But don't you think he could have gotten his point across without the use of a word that so many people ARE offended by?
And to the second part of my first post, what if President Bush said the same thing? Obviously, you wouldn't be offended, but do you think it would be ignored by the main stream media? Or would it be THE discussion of the week (month)?
Eta:^^^pretty much already answered.
You are asking a question that REALLY cannot be answered. We can guess, we can postulate, we can wonder, but we will really never know.My point is "the anointed one" will get a pass where someone else (one of the Presidents Bush, or any other well known or high ranking official, ecspecially one who is white) would probably be ran out of office, fired, or made to "step down" for simply mentioning that set of "letters grouped together"!