I personally think so but its still a long ways off, we are just in the beginnings if anything. But its not the same revolution our fore fathers encountered. I think people will become fed up with the direction Obama really want to take this country and there will be civil disobedience resulting in an overhaul on the system but no bloodshed. We are too modern to have a "take up arms revolution." There maybe one, but it will be within the realm of the constitution. Revolution is defined as a complete change of the constitution or modification of an existing constitution. Since everything but one part of the constitution can be changed, a modification of the whole document is allowed/legal but could still be viewed as a revolution.
I think/hope that this country will stand up against the far left policies and say "never again will this happen" and solidify by writing in the appropriate provision in our governing document.
To have a bloodshed revolution is pretty dumb when you could just vote all the bastards out in 2, 4, or 6 years. If you have enough people to go to war with the U.S. government, you should have enough people to result in a major change of leadership by voting.
Now if this doesn't happen, shtf could result from the people that are fed up or from other circumstances (whatever those Mayan were referring to), but no one knows what this would entail.
"Too modern"? I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that. It sounds like you mean that as a society, we have become what some would call "civilized" and what others would call "too soft". As it happens, George Soros and his lapdog Obama have already called for a change to our Constitution to remove some of the essential protections within it and some of the restrictions upon the government. In essence, this would be the revolution, and it would be to replace my United States of America with something I would not recognize and to which I would have no loyalty nor tie. That seems fitting, actually, because it certainly would have no loyalty to me, either.
Our moderators have made it very clear that planning for a shooting war in opposition to the lawfully- (or awfully-) elected government of this country will not be tolerated and such posts will be removed. I support this, primarily because I like INGO and I don't want to see it branded "subversive" nor do I want to see it fall under the scrutiny of alphabet agencies. In addition, I believe that if such planning was to occur, it would be unwise to do so in any kind of public forum where such planning could and would be monitored and used against those who made the plans. As such, I do not make any plans like that nor do I support any plans of that nature.
With that said, speaking hypothetically, I would ask you: if it is "pretty dumb" to have a bloodshed revolution when you can just vote the bastards out in 2, 4, or 6 years, but six months after the most recent election, the bastards want to replace our Constitution and in fact, our entire government in it's present form with a socialist or communist state or even a dictatorship, totally removing even the sham that the free vote has become with the advent of electronic voting machines that give no indication as to what votes were actually recorded, what option would be left to the people who still remember and respect what America is supposed to be about? That is, when the power to vote the bastards out is removed by those self-same bastards, what option have we, the people, to remind them that they are there to serve us, not the other way around?
Lastly, you wrote:
Might I remind you that our wise Founders did exactly that. In 1791, they passed, along with the other eight amendments in the document from which I took my screen name, two amendments, one of which defined strictly what the federal government is permitted to do and prohibited to it all powers having to do with anything and everything not specifically listed. The other amendment specified that there are rights appertaining to we, the people, which are not specifically listed. In other words, for us, the Constitution is simply a beginning, a protection for those rights seen as most sacred to our Founders, upon which we could, should, and must build. It was written to empower and to free us. Conversely, for our governmental servants, the Constitution was written to be a straitjacket, confining and restricting it severely to keep the power that they knew it could and would, unfettered, someday wield against the people it was supposed to serve.I think/hope that this country will stand up against the far left policies and say "never again will this happen" and solidify by writing in the appropriate provision in our governing document.
Welcome to "someday".
Blessings,
B